Winn v Bull

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1877
Year1877
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
82 cases
  • Teo Teo Lee v Ong Swee Lan and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 16 August 2002
    ...tenancy agreement’, which seemed to take centre stage in the dispute between the parties: Significant amongst them were: Winn v Bull (1877) 7 Ch D. 29; Raingold v Bromley [1931] 2 Ch D 307; Spottiswoode, Ballantyne and Company Limited v Doreen Appliances Limited [1942] 2 KB 32 (CA); and Tho......
  • R v Thompson & Son Ltd
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 25 February 1920
    ...and Gordon JJ. (1) De G. J. & S., at p. 645. (2) 9 Vesey, 351. (3) 3 Mer. 441. (4) 1 Keen, 729. (1) L. R. 3 A. C., at p. 1139. (2) L. R. 7 Ch. D. 29. (3) L. R. 18 Eq. (1) L. R. 3 A. C., at p. 1152. (1) Before Molony C.J., and Gibson and Gordon JJ. (2) 4 De G. J. & S. 638. (3) 9 Vesey, 351. ......
  • Low Kar Yit and Others v Mohamed Isa and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Diamond Peak Sdn Bhd and Another v DR Tweedie
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1981
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Status and Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...(UK) Ltd v Hungarian Institutional Bank Ltd [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 194 as cited by Boulle and Nesic, supra note 15, p.510 45 Winn v Bull (1877) 7 Ch D 29 as cited by Boulle and Nesic, supra note15, p.510 46 For example, CEDR’s Model Mediation Procedure, available at http://www.cedr.com/ docsl......
  • Intention to Create Legal Relations
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Formation
    • 4 August 2020
    ...to contract” is found in some of the reported cases, the doctrine applies to similarly worded provisions. See, for example, Winn v Bull (1877), 7 Ch D 29; Chillingworth v Esche , [1924] 1 Ch 97; Lockett v Norman-Wright , [1925] Ch 56; Eccles v Bryant and Pollock , [1948] Ch 93; Frank H Davi......
  • Intention to Create Legal Relations
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Contracts. Second Edition Formation
    • 29 August 2012
    ...contract” is found in some of the reported cases, the doctrine applies to similarly worded provisions. See, for example, Winn v. Bull (1877), 7 Ch. D. 29; Chillingworth v. Esche , [1924] 1 Ch. 97; Lockett v. Norman-Wright , [1925] Ch. 56; Eccles v. Bryant and Pollock , [1948] Ch. 93; Frank ......
  • The Certainty of Settlement
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...( UK) Ltd v Hungarian Instit utional Bank Ltd [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 194 as referred to in Boulle & Nesic Mediation 510.37 Winn v Bull (1877) 7 Ch D 29 as referr ed to in Boulle & Nesic Mediation 510. This app roach is consistent with moder n mediation pract ice. See n 38.38 For example, Cent......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT