Withers v General Theatre Corporation Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1933
Date1933

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
33 cases
  • Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 June 1997
    ...breach of the implied term, with particular reference to the decisions in Addis v. Gramophone Co. Ltd. [1909] A.C. 488 and Withers v. General Theatre Corporation Ltd. [1933] 2 K.B. 9 A dishonest and corrupt business 10These questions are best approached by focusing first on the particular ......
  • Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 March 1995
    ...of debt were rightly rejected and I would dismiss this appeal. LORD JUSTICE ALDOUS 52 I agree. LORD JUSTICE GLIDEWELLWithers v General Theatre Corporation (1933) 2 K.B.537; British Guiana Credit Corporation v De Silva (1965) 1 W.L.R.248; O'Laoire v Jackel (No.2) (1991) I.C.R. 718; Herbert C......
  • Mohamed Ali v Guyana Teachers' Union
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH (The Mihalis Angelos)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 7 Exch. 111 and Universal Cargo Carriers Corporation v. Citati [ 1957 ] 2 Q.B. 401 ; [ 1957 ] 2 W.L.R. 713 ; [ ... 98 , C.A. ; [ 1917 ] A.C. 227 , H.L.(E.) ... Withers v. General Theatre Corporation [ 1933 ] 2 K.B. 536 , C.A ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Remedies
    • 4 August 2020
    ...of the presumption thus has the effect of precluding the plaintiff from recovering an amount that would place the plaintiff in 51 [1933] 2 KB 536 (CA). 52 Hamilton , above note 47. 53 Ibid at 200, Arbour J. THE L AW OF CONTR ACTS 984 the position he or she would have been in if the contract......
  • Hire purchase and consumer protection adjudication in caricom courts
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 4-1, June 1994
    • 1 June 1994
    ...under the provisions hereof, the hirer shall pay to the owners 85 (1964) 7 W.I.R. 98. 86 Withers v. General Theater Corporation Ltd. [1933] 2 K.B. 536. 87 See Robinson v. Robinson (1851) 1 De G. M. & G. 247, 252 per Lord Cranworth, L.C. See also Cockburn v. Alexander (1848) 6 C.B. 791. by w......
  • A RIGHT TO CHOOSE: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DEFENCE OF THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE PRINCIPLE.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 77 No. 2, March 2019
    • 22 March 2019
    ...3 All ER 683 (CA) [Lavarack]. (7) Hamilton v Open Window Bakery Ltd, 2004 SCC 9 [Open Window SCC]. (8) Withers v General Theatre Corp, [1933] 2 KB 536, [1933] All ER Rep 385 (CA) (9) Re Thornett & Fehr and Yuills, Ltd, [1921] 1 KB 219 at 221, 51 Ll LR 47. (10) Phoebus D Kyprianou Coy v ......
  • Callow in More Ways Than One: The Supreme Court Causes More Confusion in Contract.
    • Canada
    • Ottawa Law Review Vol. 53 No. 1, December 2022
    • 22 December 2022
    ...term that could be truncated with notice entirely at the discretion of the defendant." See also Withers v General Theatre Corp, Ltd, [1933] 2 KB 536 at 548-49, [1933] All ER Rep 385 (CA) [Withers], Scrutton LJ: "[n]ow where a defendant has alternative ways of performing a contract at his op......
  • Get Started for Free