Wolstenholme v Post Office Ltd; Hayward v Post Office Ltd; Tooby v Post Office Ltd; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Post Office Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
The Hospital Medical Group Ltd v Westwood
...on its unique facts. 14 The next EAT decision upon which Mr Green relies is Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Post Office Limited [2003] IRLR 199. The case concerned a number of sub-postmasters and sub-postmistresses. They ran their sub-post offices under contracts with the Post Office. Ag......
- James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
-
Mrs L Fowkes v The East Midlands Synod of the United Reform Church: 2603342/2021
...or perform personally any work or services for another party to the contract’. 202. Inland Revenue Commissioners and ors v Post Office Ltd 2003 ICR 546, the EAT held that sub-postmasters and -mistresses were not ‘workers’ for the purposes of S.230(b) ERA, the Working Time Regulations or the......
-
Mr A Manning v Walker Crips Investment Management Ltd
...not indicate that he was conducting a business undertaking for clients or customers other than the respondent (Wolstenholme v Post Office [2003] ICR 546 considered). © EAT 2023 Page 2 [2023] EAT 79 Judgment approved by the court for handing down Manning v Walker Crips Michael Ford KC, Deput......
Request a trial to view additional results