Woodhouse v Consolidated Property Corporation Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date1993
Year1993

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Pearce v Ove Arup Partnership Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • January 21, 1999
    ...in the court below. For summary judgment applications, this appears to be so (see Woodhouse v. Consolidated Property Corporation [1993] 1 EGLR 174 at 176D where Lord Justice Glidewell agreed with a passage in the Supreme Court Practice suggesting that an order refusing summary judgment or g......
  • Anan Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd v VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Co)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • July 23, 2019
    ...(Sweet & Maxwell, 1990) and finds support in English Court of Appeal cases such as Woodhouse v Consolidated Property Corporation Ltd [1993] 1 EGLR 174 and Whitehead Engineering Co v Barking Breweries Ltd [1988] Lexis Citation 1171. However, the English Court of Appeal has in other cases dou......
  • Raheel Shah v Ken Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • February 11, 2022
    ...that the dispute between the Claimant and Mr and Mrs Panayiotou was not a dispute arising under the provisions of the ActWoodhouse v Consolidated Property Court (1993) 66 P & C R 234 which he said was “often cited as authority for the general proposition that the dispute mechanism in th......
  • Electra Private Equity Partners (A Ltd Partnership) and Others (Plaintiffs/Appellants) v Kpmg Peat Marwick (A Firm) and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • April 23, 1999
    ...outcome in the court below. For summary judgment applications, this appears to be so (see Woodhouse v Consolidated Property Corporation [1993] 1 EGLR 174 at 176D where Lord Justice Glidewell agreed with a passage in the Supreme Court Practice suggesting that an order refusing summary judgme......
  • Get Started for Free