Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Woolley v Colman

The Law Reports Cited in 8 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1881
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Palk v Mortgage Services Funding Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 1992
    ...This can be achieved by fixing a suitable reserve price for a sale, or by requiring the mortgagor to make a payment into court. Thus in Woolley v. Colman (1882) 21 Ch.D. 169, a mortgagor in a redemption action sought an order for sale. Sale was opposed by the first and second mortgagees. Fr......
  • Saskatoon Credit Union Ltd. v. Goertz and Atlas Industries Ltd., (1989) 73 Sask.R. 81 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 17 February 1989
    ...v. Target 21 Industries Ltd., [1988] 3 W.W.R. 97; 63 Sask.R. 13; 47 D.L.R.(3d) 349 (C.A.), appld. [para. 10]. Woolley v. Colman (1882), 21 Ch.D. 169; 51 L.J. Ch. 854, consd. [para. Canada Permanent Trust Company v. King Art Development Ltd. et al., [1984] 4 W.W.R. 587; 54 A.R. 172, appld. [......
  • Pillar Capital Corp. v Swift River Farms Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 January 2001
    ...Act, 1881, 44 & 45 Vict., c. 41, but the words “instead of foreclosure” were not used. Per Woolley v. Colman (1882), 21 Ch. D. 169; 51 L.J. Ch. 854, the court could grant both foreclosure and sale [13] Second, the English statute permits the court to direct the sale of the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT