Work v Gray

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeSir Terence Etherton,Lady Justice King,Lord Justice Moylan
Judgment Date11 April 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] EWCA Civ 270
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date11 April 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • Akhter v Khan (Attorney General intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • Invalid date
    ...Granatino)[2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 AC 534, [2010] 3 FCR 583, [2010] 3 WLR 1367, [2011] 1 All ER 373, [2010] 2 FLR 1900. Gray v Work[2017] EWCA Civ 270, [2018] Fam 35, [2017] 2 FCR 810, [2017] 3 WLR 535, [2017] 2 FLR 1297. Hudson v Leigh[2009] EWHC 1306 (Fam), [2013] Fam 77, [2009] 3 FCR 401......
  • WM v HM
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • 9 May 2017
    ...is a simple matter of fact; whether it amounted to something special justifying a departure from equality is a value judgment: see Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270 at [105]. In the very recent case of Ilott v The Blue Cross & Ors [2017] UKSC 17, the Supreme Court has explained that whether a......
  • XW v XH (no 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • 21 December 2017
    ...to the business during the marriage had been of a quality which could properly be described as special. Applying Work v Gray[2017] EWCA Civ 270, now that the Court of Appeal had removed the word ‘genius’ from the analysis, it seemed plain that the contribution made by the husband in this ca......
  • HM Attorney General v Nasreen Akhter
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 February 2020
    ...to “property rights” (and this is far from clear: Ram v Ram [2004] EWCA Civ 1452; [2005] 2 FLR 63 and Gray v Work [2017] EWCA Civ 260; [2018] Fam 35) the gateway to those property rights is the right to a decree of either divorce or 73 The judge said: “88…The unascertained right to a share ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Where the Action Is: Macro and Micro Justice in Contract Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 83-4, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...See Matr imonial Causes Act 1973, ss 25(1) and (2); White vWhite [2001] 1 AC 596; XW vXH[2017] EWHC 76, [2019] 4 WLR 83; Gray vWor k [2017] EWCA Civ 270, [2018] Fam 35.182 Thorne n 104 above at [65].750 C2020 The Author. The Modern Law Review C2020 The Moder n LawReview Limited.(2020) 83(......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT