Work vale Ltd Re (No 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date1992
Year1992

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Smith v White Knight Laundry Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 May 2001
    ...of me, that the matter is so clear that I can dispose of it." 23 The judge then referred to the Court of Appeal decision in Re Workvale Ltd [1992] 1 WLR 416 (as to which, see below), and continued (at page 9F of the transcript): "That [that is to say, the decision of the Court of Appeal in ......
  • Young (Deceased) v Western Power Distribution (South West) Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 July 2003
    ...Transcript No. 140 of 1989), or through being issued against a company which had been struck off the register ( In re Workvale Ltd. [1992] 1 WLR. 416), the Walkley principle does not apply to defeat in limine a second action, notwithstanding that in each of those cases the defect was recogn......
  • Piggott v Aulton (Deceased)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 January 2003
  • Shapland v Palmer
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 March 1999
    ...of Appeal transcript 17th February 1989), or through being issued against a company which had been struck off the register ( In re Workvale Limited [1992] 1 WLR 416), the Walkley principle does not apply to defeat in limine a second action, notwithstanding that in each of those cases the de......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 24: Limitation Act 1980
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Commercial and Maritime Statutes
    • Invalid date
    ...Shipping Co Ltd [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 34; Donovan v Gwentoys Ltd [1990] 1 WLR 472; Halford v Brookes [1991] 1 WLR 428; In re Workvale Ltd (No 2) [1992] 1 WLR 416; Hartley v Birmingham City District Council [1992] 1 WLR 968; Nash v Eli Lilly & Co [1993] 1 WLR 782; Dobbie v Medway Health Autho......
  • Chapter 16: Contract insurance under JCT Standard Building Contract 2011
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Construction Insurance and UK Construction Contracts
    • Invalid date
    ...death or personal injury, by the Companies Act 1989). For the restoration procedure in personal injury cases, see Re Workvale Ltd (No. 2) [1992] 2 All ER 627. 20 [1958] 1 WLR 697. 21 (1868) LR 3 HL 330. 22 Difficult questions may arise as to whether or not a loss can reasonably be foreseen ......
  • Table of cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Construction Insurance and UK Construction Contracts
    • Invalid date
    ...Pty Ltd v H & R—E & W Pty Ltd [1999] WASCA 1024 13.57, 13.116 Woolcott v Excess [1979] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 231 7.15 Workvale Ltd (No 2), Re [1992] 2 All ER 627 16.16 Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30 3.52 Wrotham Park Estate Co v Parkside Houses Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798 3.103 Wuhan Guoyo Logistics G......