Wright v Macadam

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1949
Date1949

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
49 cases
  • Ward v Kirkland
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 619F–G , 620F , 621E–H , 622E ) ... Wright v. Macadam [ 1949 ] 2 K.B. 744 ; [ 1949 ] 2 All E.R. 565 , C.A. applied ... Long v. Gowlett [ 1923 ] 2 Ch. 177 distinguished ... ...
  • Graham v Philcox
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 April 1984
    ...is to say, a right known to the law." 16 Both these cases were cited with approval in the judgments in this court in the later case of Wright v. Macadam (1949) 2 King's Bench 744. In relation to the instant appeal, the facts of that decided case are of some interest. The defendant landlord ......
  • Crow v Wood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 June 1970
    ...although it was not expressly mentioned. 12 Section 62 has already been considered in this Court, notably in Wright v. Macadam, 1949, 2 K.B. 744: and Phipps v. Pears & Others, 1965, 1 Q.B. 76. It is clear from those cases that when land in common ownership is severed and one piece of it......
  • Phipps v Pears
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 10 March 1964
    ...that it is capable of being granted at law so as to be binding on all successors in title, even those who take without notice, see Wright v. Macadam. 1949, 2 K. B., 747. A fine view, or an expanse open to the winds, may be an fiadvantage" to a house but it would not pass under Section 62. W......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • AT THE INTERSECTION OF PROPERTY AND INSOLVENCY: THE INSOLVENT COMPANY’S ENCUMBERED ASSETS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...he is making; (1994) 14 OJLS 8 at 93. Also, see the point made in the following paragraph in the text. 158 See, eg, Wright v Macadam[1949] 2 KB 744 (CA). 159 London & Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd [1992] 1 WLR 1278. 160 Moody v Steggles (1879) 12 Ch D 261. 161 Since A&W c......