WUNDERKIND Trade Mark

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2002
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • EI Dupont de Nemours & Company v ST Dupont
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 October 2003
    ...103 Pumfrey J considered the question of admitting fresh evidence in a trade mark appeal under the 1994 Act in Wunderkind Trade Mark [2002] R.P.C. 45. He concluded that proceedings before the Registrar of Trade Marks were intended closely to resemble proceedings in court and there was noth......
  • Ministere de l'Agriculture de la Foret v Bernard Matthews Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 May 2010
    ...also advanced the following factors (apart from the Ladd v Marshall principles), which were enumerated in Wunderkind Trade Mark [2002] RPC 45 at 937 (approved by DU PONT Trade Mark [2004] FSR 15 at [103]), in assisting this court in determining whether it should exercise its discretion in r......
  • Consolidated Developments Ltd v Andrew Alexander Cooper
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 July 2018
    ...in particular, the concept of proportionality, set out in part I of the Civil Procedure Rules.” 28 However, in Wunderkind Trade Mark [2002] R.P.C 45 Pumfrey J considered that the introduction of Part 52 had changed the law in a significant manner and that what Laddie J had said in Hunt-Wess......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT