Yagnesh Mohanlal Devani v Republic of Kenya

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeSir Richard Aikens
Judgment Date11 December 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] EWHC 3535 (Admin)
Docket NumberCase No: CO/4218/2014
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Date11 December 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Yagnesh Devani
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 May 2020
    ...a decision dated 3 September 2014 dismissing his challenge. He appealed to the High Court. By a decision dated 11 December 2015 ( [2015] EWHC 3535 (Admin)) a Divisional Court comprising Leggatt J and Sir Richard Aikens dismissed his 4 One of Mr Devani's grounds of challenge to his extradit......
  • Quadra Commodities S.A. v XL Insurance Company Se and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 April 2023
    ...relying on the decision of the Divisional Court (Leggatt J as he then was and Sir Richard Aikens) in Devani v Republic of Kenya [2015] EWHC 3535 (Admin) particularly at [23] and [57]. He submitted that it was difficult to see why an advance payment should be treated differently in terms of......
  • Nirav Deepak Modi v Government of India
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 9 August 2021
    ...could be convicted at summary trial on an information against him, upon the basis of the notional English charges”: Devani v Kenya [2015] EWHC 3535 (Admin) at [49]. However, he submits that the “one possible view” must be one which a reasonable jury could reach. It was inherently unlikely ......
  • Vijay Mallya v Government of India
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 April 2020
    ...the requesting state to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, although the submissions acknowledge the passage in Devani v Kenya [2015] EWHC 3535 (Admin), where Aitkens LJ analysed the correct approach to s.84(1): “Issue one: the correct test to be applied under section 84(1) of the EA? ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT