Young v Sealey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1949 |
| Date | 1949 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
42 cases
-
Shaw (Christine) v National Commercial Bank and another
... ... 11 Mrs. Haughton Cardenas in citing the case of Young v Sealy 1949 1 A11E.R. 92, asserted that the facts of that case are similar to the case under review. Both cases are clearly distinguishable. In ... ...
-
Pearson v Cayman National Bank Ltd
...L.R. 20 Eq. 328; 39 J.P. 775. (3) Russell v. ScottUNK(1936), 55 C.L.R. 440; [1936] Aust. L.R. 375, applied. (4) Young v. Sealey, [1949] Ch. 278; [1949] 1 All E.R. 92, applied. Banking-accounts-joint account-transfer of account into joint names with stranger for no consideration creates pres......
-
Yeo Guan Chye Terence and another v Lau Siew Kim
...belong to the benefiting party after his death, ie, the resulting trust is rebutted as to the remainder: see, for example, Young v Sealey [1949] Ch 278. We are of the view that the presumption of advancement could similarly operate with respect to only part of the interest in the property i......
-
Gwenneth Webster v National Bank of Anguilla Ltd
...agreements, the signature of the "undersigned" was required to authorize payments. 22 Ms. Ruan also referred the court toYoung v. Sealy [1949] 1 All ER 92 in which the nephew was a joint account holder and signatory to the account. As such he had both the legal title and beneficial interest......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
English fiduciary standards and trust law.
...Trusts [1952] 1 D.L.R. 41; Anderson v. Patton [1948] 2 D.L.R. 202, 203-08 (Parlee J.A., dissenting). (249.) See Young v. Sealey, [1949] Ch. 278, 284, (250.) As a result, there can be no trust for the "beneficiaries" as. emphasized by Millett L.J. in Armitage v. Nurse, [1998] Ch. 241,253 (C.......
2 provisions
-
10 U.S.C. § 8662 Naming
...34 U.S.C. 461. May 4, 1898, ch. 234, 30 Stat. 390 (2d sentence under "Armor and Armament"); May 13, 1908, ch. 166, 35 Stat. 159; June 29, 1949, ch. 278, 63 Stat. 300 (6th par.). 7292(c) 34 U.S.C. 463. R.S. 1533. In subsection (a) the words "care shall be taken that" are omitted as surplusag......
-
10 U.S.C. § 8715 Naval Observatory: Administration
...III, §301, 60 Stat. 1099. 5 U.S.C. 461. Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 852, 31 Stat. 1122 (2d par., last sentence). 5 U.S.C. 463. R.S. 436; June 29, 1949, ch. 278, 63 Stat. 300 (2d In subsection (a) the words "together with their respective functions, are hereby transferred from the Bureau of Naval Pers......