Yourell v Hibernian Bank Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 05 February 1918 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1918] UKHL J0205-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Docket Number | [1916] 1 I. R. 312, 321. |
| Date | 05 February 1918 |
[1918] UKHL J0205-1
House of Lords
After bearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 2d, as Tuesday the 3d, days of July last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Mary Elizabeth Yourell, of Piercetown, in the County of Meath, Ireland, and Margaret McDermott (formerly Margaret Yourell), of Spring Cottage, Malahide, in the County of Dublin, Ireland, praying that the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal in Ireland, of the 20th of June 1916, except so far as regards the words "and it is Ordered that the said Hibernian Bank, Limited, do abide their own Costs of this Action up to this date together with their Costs of this Appeal, and subject to the Variations aforesaid, it is Ordered that the said Judgment of the Master...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
National Bank of Greece S.A. (Appellants) v Pinios Shipping Company No. 1 and Another (Respondents)
...94) 27 That must be regarded as the basis for the decision in the case. No more should, in my opinion, be read into it. Indeed in Yourell v. Hibernian Bank Ltd. [1918] A.C. 372, in which Crosskill v. Bower was distinguished, Lord Atkinson (at pp. 389-390) treated it as a case in which, by r......
- Foo See Moi; Malayan Banking Bhd
-
Financial Institutions Services Ltd v Negril Holdings and Negril Investment Company Ltd
...S.A. [1973] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 437. On the other hand the circumstances of the instant cases in many aspects correspond to those in Yourell v. Hibernian Bank [1918] A.C. 372. Here is how Lord Atkinson states the principle at page 391, the situation which governs when no objection is made in t......
-
Financial Institutions Services Ltd v Negril Holdings et Al
...Rep. 437. On the other hand the circumstances of the instant cases in many aspects correspond to those in Yourell v. Hibernian Bank [1918] A.C. 372. Here is how Lord Atkinson states the principle at page 391, the situation which governs when no objection is made in the absence of forgery: “......
-
The barbados companies act, cap. 308 and receivers' duties
...charge as well 121 (1979) 3 All E.R. 842. 122 Leicester Permanent Building Society v. Butt [1943] Ch. 308; Youvell v. Hiberni Bank Ltd. [1918] A.C. 372; Liverpool Corpn. v. Hope [1938] 1 K.B. 75. 123 Leicester Permanent Building Society v. Butt [1943] A.C. 372. 124 Youvell v. Hibernia Bank ......
-
Table of Cases
...237 Young (M) Legal Associates Ltd v Zahid (A Firm) and Others [2006] EWCA Civ 613, [2006] 1 WLR 2562 14 Yourell v Hibernian Bank Ltd [1918] AC 372 225 Zebra Industrial Products Ltd, Re [2005] BCC 104 90 Zodiac Pool Solutions SAS, Re [2014] EWHC 2365 (Ch), [2014] BCC 569 23, 30 ...
-
Receivership
...[1987] BCLC 232. 195 LPA, s 101(3). 196 LPA, s 101(1)(iii). 197 LPA, s 109(3). 198 LPA, s 109(4). 199 Yourell v Hibernian Bank Ltd [1918] AC 372. 226 Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships requires that the income received by the receiver is to be applied by him in......
-
Table of cases
...309 Young v. Grote (1827), 4 Bing. 253, 130 E.R. 764 ...................................... 273, 295 Yourell v. Hibernian Bank Ltd., [1918] A.C. 372 (H.L.) ..................................... 244 ...