Yuill v Yuill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1945
Year1945
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
391 cases
  • PP, The; Tan Kheng Ann and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Bhag Singh; Nihal Singh
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1977
  • English v O'Driscoll
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 29 May 2019
    ...and cross-examination in order to make an allegation of fraud. They refer to the judgment of Lord Greene MR in Yuill v. Yuill [1945] All ER 183 who stated at p. 189: ‘A judge who observes the demeanour of the witnesses while they are being examined by counsel has from his detached position......
  • Jaafar bin Shaari v Tan Lip Eng
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
14 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1983
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...1040. 44 Yaw Duedu v. Eyi Yiboe (1961) 1 W.L.R. 1040. 136 Young v. Ladies Imperial Club Ltd. (1929) 1 Q B 81 494 Yuill v. Yuill (1945) 1 All E.R. 183 at 189 592 Zehrlaut v. State (1951) 230 Ind. 175. 2 ...
  • 1. Administrative Procedure Act
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Federal Administrative Procedure Sourcebook. Fourth Edition
    • 1 January 2009
    ...as statutes otherwise provide, the proponent of a rule or order shall have the burden of proof.” In the Senate Comparative Print, June 1945, p. 15 (Sen. Doc. p. 31), it is stated that “The provision relating to burden of proof is the standard rule.” There is some indication that the term “b......
  • Sentencing in South Africa: Lacking in principle but delivering justice?
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 19 August 2019
    ...N Steytler Constitutional Criminal Procedure (1998) 340-2.33 Section 186 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.34 Yuill v Yuill [1945] 1 All ER 183 (CA) at 189B.Yuill v Yuill [1945] 1 All ER 183 (CA) at 189B.Yuill v Yuill35 The metaphor has been referred to innumerable times in South Afr......
  • TORIOLA & ORS. V. WILLIAMS
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1982 Cases reported in 1982
    • 22 November 2022
    ...8. Laurie v. Raglan Building Co. Ltd. (1942) 1 KB 152 at 156. 9. Parry v. Aluminium Corporation (1940) W.N. 44 at 46. 10. Yuil v. Yuil (1945) All E.R. 183 at 185. 11.Raji Akano & another v. Attah Yisau Ajuwon (1966) 1 All N.L.R. 246 (247). 12. Lissenden v. C.A.V. Bosch Ltd (1940) A.C. 412. ......
  • Get Started for Free