Zumax Nigeria Ltd v First City Monument Bank Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Barling
Judgment Date10 November 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] EWHC 2804 (Ch)
Docket NumberCase No: HC-2013-000590
CourtChancery Division
Date10 November 2017
Between:
Zumax Nigeria Limited
Claimant
and
First City Monument Bank Plc
Defendant

[2017] EWHC 2804 (Ch)

Before:

The Honourable Mr Justice Barling

Case No: HC-2013-000590

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

CHANCERY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Mr Francis Moraes (instructed by Mordi & Co) for the Claimant

Dr Fidelis Oditah QC and Mr Phillip Aliker (instructed by Alan Taylor & Co) for the Defendant

Hearing dates: 24–26 January and 6–10 & 13 March 2017

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

Mr Justice Barling

Index

Paragraph

Heading or sub-heading

Page 4

Glossary of defined terms

[1]

Introduction

[12]

Background

The present application for summary judgment

[40]

The relevant principles

[48]

The defences and counterclaim pleaded

[51]

The transfers in question

[54]

The issues

(a) Was there a trust?

[55]

The parties' submissions

[70]

Discussion of trust issue

[77]

Do the funds belong to Redsear?

[81]

Does the Debenture preclude a trust?

[82]

Conclusion on trust issue

[84]

The 3 rd transfer — 12 May 2000 for $205,000

[91]

(b) Did IMB control the IMB Morgan Commerzbank Account?

[104]

(c) The payment defence: Were the funds in question repaid to Zumax by bankers' drafts?

[132]

The 10 th transfer: $410,000

[138]

Conclusion: the payment defence

[142]

(d) Does the 2005 Agreement or the Consent Order bar these proceedings?

[146]

Effect of the ruling of Nicol-Clay J on 24 June 2010?

[147]

There was no consideration for the 2005 Agreement?

[157]

Were the 2005 Agreement/Consent Order induced by fraudulent misrepresentations?

[160]

Representation as to Zumax's indebtedness

[162]

Representation as to the extent of recoveries in receivership

[172]

No reliance/inducement?

[181]

Conclusion: Whether the 2005 Agreement/the Consent Order were induced by fraudulent misrepresentations

[183]

The 2005 Agreement/Consent Order is subject to unsatisfied preconditions?

[192]

(e) Is this claim an abuse of the process of the court, or otherwise precluded, because of the 784 Proceedings?

[201]

(f) Does the Debenture deprive Zumax of title to sue for the funds?

[209]

Discussion and conclusions on the Debenture issue

[220]

(g) Is this claim time-barred by statute or laches?

[224]

Accrual of cause of action in absence of a trust

[226]

Concealment – section 32 of the 1980 Act

[235]

Laches

[244]

(h) Does the counterclaim have a real prospect of success?

[255]

Conclusion on Zumax's application for summary judgment

[257]

Next steps

Page 60

Annex 1

Page 62

Annex 2

Glossary of Defined Terms

Term

Paragraph where first defined

Definition

Bliss

13

Bliss International Limited, a shareholder in Zumax

CBN

14

the Central Bank of Nigeria

Chase

7

JP Morgan Bank, formerly Chase Manhattan International Limited

FCMB

3

First City Monument Bank plc successor to IMB & Finbank

Finbank

3

Finbank plc

IMB

3

IMB International Bank plc

IMB Morgan

3

IMB Morgan plc, formerly IMB Securities plc

Redsear

7

Redsear Ltd, a company incorporated in the Isle of Man

the 115 Proceedings

25

A claim by IMB in the Lagos High Court (LD/115/05) against Zumax for Naira 309 million, in which the Consent Order was made

the 1668 Proceedings

33

Proceedings brought in the Lagos High Court (LD/1668/2009) by Zumax against Finbank, seeking to set aside the Consent Order

the 2004 Agreement

24

A settlement agreement between IMB and Zumax, which was aborted by the parties before it came into effect

the 2005 Agreement

24

An agreement between IMB and Zumax dated 23 May 2005, the terms of which were later incorporated into the Consent Order

the 784 Proceedings

34

Proceedings brought in Nigeria by Zumax against Mr Chinye and Finbank

the Biu Proceedings

24

Proceedings brought against IMB in Nigeria by one of the receivers of Zumax contending that the 2004 Agreement represented a fraud on Zumax as its debt to IMB had been discharged during the receivership

the Consent Order

29

A consent order dated 15 July 2005 in the 115 Proceedings, incorporating the terms of the 2005 Agreement

the Court of Appeal Judgment

9

A judgment of the Court of Appeal on FCMB's appeal against the decision of Mr Charles Hollander QC in FCMB's challenge to the jurisdiction of the English court in the present claim, handed down 23 June 2016

the Debenture

16

A debenture dated 17 December 1998 to secure an overdraft by Zumax from IMB through Zumax's Naira Account

the Hollander Judgment

9

The Judgment of Mr Charles Hollander QC of 1 July 2014 in FCMB's challenge to the jurisdiction of the English court in the present claim

the IMB Commerzbank Accounts

4

Bank accounts nos. 160122964010 & 160122964015 held in the name of IMB at the London branch of Commerzbank AG

the IMB Morgan Commerzbank Account

4

Bank account no 160210002200 held in the name of IMB Morgan at the London branch of Commerzbank AG

the Interpleader Proceedings

76(v)

Proceedings brought by Commerzbank against IMB Morgan, in which the judgment of Lawrence Collins J is at [2004] EWHC 2771 (Ch)

the Redsear Account

7

A US dollar bank account held by Redsear at the London branch of Chase

the SimmonsCooper Letter

36

A letter from FCMB's solicitors dated 24 June 2013 in response to Zumax's letter before action in the present claim

the Summary Report

18

Report of Zumax's auditor, Chief Edoja, dated 30 July 2003

the Warri Schedule

110

Schedule entitled "Naira Disbursements to Warri: December 2000–July 2002" produced by Mr Chinye

Zumax

1

Zumax Nigeria Limited, the Claimant

Zumax's Naira Account

5

Bank Account no 0101020000026 held in the name of Zumax at the Lagos branch of IMB

Introduction

1

This is an application by the Claimant, Zumax Nigeria Limited ("Zumax"), for summary judgment on the claim and counterclaim.

2

Zumax is a Nigerian company previously engaged in the supply of engineering and other services to various multi-national oil companies in Nigeria. Zumax's premises are located in Warri, said to be the oil capital of Nigeria.

3

The Defendant, First City Monument Bank plc ("FCMB"), is a Nigerian registered bank. It is the result of a series of mergers with other Nigerian banks, including IMB International Bank plc ("IMB") and Finbank plc ("Finbank"). FCMB assumed all the liabilities and obligations of those banks. IMB Morgan plc ("IMB Morgan") was a subsidiary of IMB. IMB Morgan was formerly called IMB Securities plc. In this judgment I refer to "FCMB" or "IMB" or "Finbank" without distinction.

4

At all material times, IMB held two U.S. dollar denominated correspondent bank accounts (no.160122964010 and 160122964015), at the London branch of Commerzbank AG ("the IMB Commerzbank Accounts"). At the same branch there was also a U.S. dollar denominated correspondent bank account (no.160210002200) in the name of IMB Morgan ("the IMB Morgan Commerzbank Account").

5

IMB were Zumax's main bankers, and at all material times Zumax held with IMB in Lagos an account denominated in Naira numbered 0101020000026 ("Zumax's Naira Account").

6

The managing director of IMB was a Mr Edwin Chinye. He also became a director of Zumax in circumstances to which I will refer in due course.

7

Zumax invoiced its oil company clients, at least in part, in US dollars. Redsear Limited ("Redsear"), a nominee of Zumax incorporated in the Isle of Man, received dollar payments in a US dollar account held in its name at the London branch of Chase Manhattan International Limited, which subsequently became JP Morgan Bank, ("Chase"). The dollar funds in this account ("the Redsear Account") were used by Zumax for the needs of its business, for example to purchase equipment, with any surplus funds being transferred to Nigeria for use in its business there.

8

The claim, brought on 3 October 2013, is for US$3,752,000 plus interest. It is Zumax's contention that between May 2000 and April 2002 funds totalling US$3,752,000 belonging to Zumax were remitted by ten transfers for the benefit of Zumax to IMB/IMB Morgan at their London accounts with Commerzbank. The claim is a proprietary one for the recovery of what Zumax submits to be trust property. It is made against FCMB as successor in title to IMB and on the basis that IMB Morgan was IMB's agent/nominee and under its control. At at least one stage in these proceedings FCMB appeared to accept that IMB Morgan was controlled by IMB. 1

9

The claim was served out of the jurisdiction on FCMB on 8 October 2013, pursuant to an Order by Deputy Master Nurse dated 20 September 2013. In December 2013

FCMB applied to challenge jurisdiction. That and other applications were heard in May 2014 and dismissed by Mr Charles Hollander QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, in a reserved judgment on 1 July 2014 ("the Hollander Judgment"). FCMB's appeal was heard in May 2016 and dismissed in a reserved judgment handed down on 23 June 2016 ("the Court of Appeal Judgment")
10

On 5 March 2014 Zumax issued the present application for summary judgment, which was stayed pending the outcome of FCMB's jurisdiction challenge. Following the Court of Appeal Judgment, FCMB filed a defence and counterclaim on 19 July 2016. Further information...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • First City Monument Bank Plc v Zumax Nigeria Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 March 2019
    ...APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS BUSINESS LIST (ChD) Mr Justice Barling [2017] EWHC 2804 (Ch) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Miss Poonam Melwani QC and Mr Paul Henton (instructed by Clyde & Co) for the Mr Francis......
  • Zumax Nigeria Ltd v First City Monument Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 17 November 2022
    ...matters including the precise form of order. That hearing should be heard as soon as possible within the next few weeks. 1 [2017] EWHC 2804 (Ch). 2 [2019] EWCA Civ 3 The numbers of his witness statements follows on from the number of his witness statements in the 2013 Claim. ...
2 firm's commentaries
  • Financial Markets Disputes and Regulatory Update - January 2018 - Judgments
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 16 January 2018
    ...1 WLR 1627 Application for summary judgment granted after nine-day hearing Zumax Nigeria Limited v. First City Monument Bank Plc [2017] EWHC 2804 (Ch) At first glance, it may seem something of a contradiction to hold a summary judgment hearing over nine days. In this case the court held tha......
  • Application For Summary Judgment Granted After Nine-Day Hearing
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 19 January 2018
    ...Nigeria Limited v. First City Monument Bank Plc [2017] EWHC 2804 (Ch) At first glance, it may seem something of a contradiction to hold a summary judgment hearing over nine days. In this case the court held that it would have been wrong to shy away from looking carefully into whether there ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT