R v O

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date02 September 2008
Date02 September 2008
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Court of Appeal, Criminal Division

Before Lord Justice Laws, Mr Justice Jack and Sir Charles Gray

Regina
and
O
No fair trial for victim of people trafficking

Those who prosecuted defendants charged with immigration offences who might be victims of people-trafficking must be aware of the protocols in relation to such victims enshrined in the Code for Crown Prosecutors; defence lawyers must make inquiries if there was credible material showing that their client might have been such a victim, especially if the client was young.

The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, so stated when allowing an appeal by O against her conviction, on her plea of guilty, of possessing a false identity card with the intention of using it as her own, on March 17, 2008, at Canterbury Crown Court before Judge Adele Williams.

Mr Peter Carter QC and Miss Parosha Chandran, neither appeared below, assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals, for the appellant; Miss Noemi Byrd, not below, for the Crown.

LORD JUSTICE LAWS, giving the judgment of the court, said that article 10 of the Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (Council of Europe Treaty Series 197) required state parties to identify and protect victims of trafficking.

As a signatory to that Convention, the United Kingdom was obliged by article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to refrain from acts which would defeat the purpose of the Trafficking Convention.

The United Kingdom had taken some measures expressly to support that purpose, by the terms of two protocols: (i) on prosecution of defendants charged with immigration offences who might be trafficked victims and (ii) on prosecution of young offenders charged with offences who might be trafficked victims.

Under the first protocol where a credible trafficked victim was prosecuted for an immigration offence, which included the possession of a false identity document, prosecutors were required to consider whether the public interest was best served in continuing the prosecution.

In the case of young defendants, where there was clear evidence that the youth had a credible defence of duress, the case should be discontinued on evidential grounds. Where the evidence was less certain, further details should be sought from the police and youth offender teams.

Any youths who might be traffic victims, should be afforded the protection of the child care legislation if there were concerns that they had been...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 books & journal articles
  • Playing by the rules: combating al Qaeda within the law of war.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 51 No. 3, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...POST, Sept. 11, 2008, at A1. (392.) See Jane Perlez & Pit Subair Shah, Confronting Taliban, Pakistan Finds Itself at War, N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 2, 2008, at A1 (describing Pakistan's efforts against (393.) Guiden, supra note 389, at 224. (394.) See supra Part III.A-B. (395.) Adam Liptak, In T......
  • From the greenhouse to the poorhouse: carbon-emissions control and the rules of legislative joinder.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 158 No. 4, March 2010
    • 1 March 2010
    ...programs in resisting Republicans' budget proposals). (221) See Maura Reynolds et al., Senate OKs Sweetened Bailout Bill, L.A. TIMES, Oct. 2, 2008, at (222) In 2008, Congress renamed food stamps the "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program" (SNAP). See Food, Conservation, and Energy Act o......
  • The sound of money: securing copyright, royalties, and creative "progress" in the digital music revolution.
    • United States
    • Federal Communications Law Journal Vol. 62 No. 3, June 2010
    • 1 June 2010
    ...Fed. Reg. 57,033 (Oct. 1, 2008) (codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 385). See also Ben Sisario, First Royalty Rates Set for Digital Music, N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 2, 2008, at C8. The CRB's October 2008 decision altered a similar deal struck between the recording industry, music publishers, and online music......
  • U.S. military responsibility for environmental cleanup in contingency environments.
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Vol. 45 No. 1, January - January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...Solid Waste Management 1 (2010) [hereinafter GAO Report 11-63]. (111) Kelly Kennedy, Report: Army Making Toxic Mess in War Zones, Army Times, Oct. 2, 2008, http://www.armytimes.com/article/20081002/NEWS/810020318/Report-Army-making-toxic-mess-war-zones (last visited Feb. 14, (112) See GAO R......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT