A v B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Phillips J. |
| Judgment Date | 21 December 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm) |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Date | 21 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Towergate Financial (Group) Ltd v Mr Mitchel Hopkinson
...Faraday relates to an insurance contract on standard terms with a different wording. 112 Nor indeed is the late appearing authority of A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm), relied on by the Claimants in oral argument, analogous; that case concerned construction of the new LCIA Rules against a bac......
-
The Czech Republic v Diag Human SE
...to whether the arbitration agreement could shorten the time available for a challenge so that it had to be made before the “first step” (see A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm), [31]–[33]). That potential wrinkle apart, it is clearly sufficient if the party meets one of those time limits – such ......
-
Dreymoor Fertilisers Overseas Pte Ltd v Eurochem Trading GmbH
...one Request, and because it is not possible to commence claims under two or more separate LCIA arbitration clauses in a single arbitration ( A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm)). 20 Following the First Procedural Meeting on 31 July 2017, however, Mr Malek QC made a Procedural Order which included......
12 firm's commentaries
-
GAFTA Rules Permit Claims Under Multiple Contracts In Single Notice Of Arbitration, Says English Court (This Time)
...The decision is of particular interest given that the Court reached a different outcome from the earlier decision of A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm) (blog post available here), in which the Court upheld a section 67 challenge in similar The Underlying Contracts and Disputes Under two separate......
-
GAFTA Rules Permit Claims Under Multiple Contracts In Single Notice Of Arbitration, Says English Court (This Time)
...The decision is of particular interest given that the Court reached a different outcome from the earlier decision of A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm) (blog post available here), in which the Court upheld a section 67 challenge in similar The Underlying Contracts and Disputes Under two separate......
-
Separate Requests essential in multi-contract LCIA arbitrations
...This means that, in some cases, a jurisdictional objection may not emerge until months into the arbitration. Decision: A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm) Facts B sold two shipments of crude oil to A under two separate contracts. Each contained an LCIA arbitration B commenced arbitration against ......
-
Global Vantage: London Court Of International Arbitration Issues Updated Rule-set
...Under the LCIA Rules 2014, Composite Requests were not considered to be possible, given that the Commercial Court in A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm) found that the LCIA Rules 2014 required that a new arbitration request was submitted for each and every arbitration. Further notable amendments ......
Request a trial to view additional results