R v Medical Appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region)ex parte Hubble
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1959 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Kerr v Department for Social Development
...Act is not in the same position as a litigant. His position is similar to that described by Diplock J in R v Medical Appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region), Ex p Hubble [1958] 2 QB 228, 240. The claim to benefit in that case was a claim to receive money out of insurance funds fed by contri......
-
John Peng v The State [1982] PNGLR 331
...[1964] SASR 40, R v McDermott (No 1) (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 379, Ross v R [1922] VLR 329, R v Medical Appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region) [1959] 2 QB 408, R v Parks (1962) 46 Cr App R 29, R v Robinson [1917] 2 KB 108, R v Sichel (1913) 13 SR (NSW) 259, R v Thomas (1959) 43 Cr App R 210, R v ......
-
R v National Insurance Commissioner.ex parte Viscusi
...comments on one submission made by Mr. Slynn. The sub-section was considered by the Divisional Court and by this Court in R. v. Medical Appeal Tribunal, Ex parte Hubble (1958) 2 Q.B. 228, and (1959) 1 Q.B. 408. The Divisional Court took a somewhat narrow view of the powers accorded by that ......
-
R ANAYET BEGUM v Social Security Commissioners
...Tribunal have an inquisitorial jurisdiction ( R v Deputy Industry Injuries Commissioner ex parte Moore [1965] 1 QB 456 and R v Medical Appeal Tribunal ex party Hubble [1958] 2 QB 228). It is also common ground that the Commissioner may give leave on the basis of grounds not raised in the gr......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...R. v. Medical Appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region), Ex parte Hubble (1959) 3 All E.R. 40................................................................................................699 R. v. Meyrick & Ribuff (1929) 21 C.A.R. 94.............................................…452 R. v. Nwi......
-
Preliminary sections
...Regina v. Medical Appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region) Ex-parte Humble (1959) 3 All E.R. 40 S.D……………………………………….....................................................................…..……977 Regina v. Silverlock (1894) 2 QB 776…………...................................................................
-
FRESH EVIDENCE
..."A definition of the expression is given by Morris, L.J. in R. v. Medical Appeal Tribunal (North Midland Region), Ex parte Hubble (1959) 3 All E.R. 40-47 thus: - "Fresh evidence" it seems to me, must have the quality of newness, or the feature of having become newly available and obtainable......