Abigall v Lapin
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1934 |
| Year | 1934 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
76 cases
- Goh Keng How v Raja Zainal Abidin bin Raja Hussin and Another
- Lin Nyuk Chan v Wong Sz Tsin
- Meyappa Chettiar; Ramasamy Chettiar
-
Chip Thye Enterprises Pte Ltd v Development Bank of Singapore Ltd
...amount: at [46]. Aberfoyle Plantations Ltd v Khaw Bian Cheng [1960] AC 115; [1959] 3 All ER 910 (distd) Abigail (since deceased) v Lapin [1934] AC 491 (folld) Chi Liung Holdings Sdn Bhd v AG [1994] 2 SLR (R) 314; [1994] 2 SLR 354 (refd) Heron Garage Properties Ltd v Moss [1974] 1 WLR 148; [......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Properties Ltd, [2003] 2 WWR 642, 4 RPR (4th) 271 (Alta QB) ..............................................164, 165 Abigail v Lapin, [1934] AC 491 at 504 (PC) ....................................................... 255 Adderley v Dixon (1824), 1 Sim & St 607, 57 ER 239 ............................
-
Competing Rights
...and distinct having grave and strong efect to accomplish the purpose. 67 64 Ibid at 83–84. 65 Ibid at 78. 66 (1875) LR 7 HL 496. 67 [1934] AC 491 at 504 (PC). THE L AW OF PROPERTY 256 3) Mere Equities The term mere equity is confusing. The rights classiied as mere equities include both righ......
-
The End of Knowing Receipt
...enrichment at the beneiciaries’ expense. 77 73. his is essentially what happened in Foskett , supra note 31. 74. Abigail v Lapin , [1934] AC 491 (PC (Austl)). 75. Citadel, supra note 37 at para 48; Gold v Rosenberg , [1997] 3 SCR 767 at para 46. 76. Twinsectra , supra note 39 at para 105. 7......
