Abrath v North Eastern Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1883
Date1883
Year1883
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
93 cases
  • Payremalu Veerappan v Dr Amarjeet Kaur and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • Rea v Gibbs
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 5 July 1994
    ...(1) Abbott v. Refuge Assur. Co. Ltd., [1962] 1 Q.B. 432; [1961] 3 All E.R. 1074, distinguished. (2) Abrath v. North E. Ry. Co.ELR(1883), 11 Q.B.D. 440, dictum of Bowen, L.J. applied. (3) Cedeno v. O”BrienUNK(1964), 7 W.I.R. 192. (4) Conway v. Rimmer, [1968] A.C. 910; [1968] 1 All E.R. 874, ......
  • Liaw Song Kee and Another v Saw Chai Kee
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2014
  • Lim Heng Soon and Another v PP
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • LEGAL BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENTIAL BURDEN OF PROOF, DISTINCTION BETWEEN
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition L
    • 6 February 2019
    ...varies, so will the evidential burden shift to the party who would fail without further evidence. See: Abrath v. North Eastern Rly Co. (1883) 11 Q.B.D. 440 at 456, C.A. per Bowen L.J." - Per Mohammad, J.S.C., in Nwavu v. Okoye Suit No. S.C. 214/ 2003; (2008) 18 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1118) 29 at 64 -...