Acton v Graham Pearce & Company (A Firm)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Hall (Arthur J.S.) & Co. v. Simons, (2000) 258 N.R. 1 (HL)
...2 A.C. 93, refd to. [para. 97]. R. v. Clinton, [1993] 1 W.L.R. 1181, refd to. [paras. 97, 136]. Acton v. Pearce (Graham) & Co., [1997] 3 All E.R. 909, refd to. [paras. 99, 149, 250]. Roy v. Prior, [1971] A.C. 470, refd to. [paras. 109, 198]. Golder v. United Kingdom (1975), 1 E.H.R.R. 5......
-
G.F. v. Reardon, (2005) 194 O.A.C. 201 (CA)
...6]. Allied Maples Group v. Simmons & Simmons, [1995] 1 W.L.R. 1602 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 81]. Acton v. Pearce (Graham) and Co., [1997] 3 All E.R. 909 (Ch. D.), disagreed with [para. Saif Ali v. Mitchell (Sydney) & Co., [1978] 3 All E.R. 1033 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 85]. Boudreau v......
-
Arthur J S Hall & Company (Respondent/Plaintiff) v Melvyn Keith Simons
...the reason for it and the complaint made about it. Cases referred to in judgment of the courtActon v Graham Pearce & Co (a firm) [1997] 3 All ER 909. Ashmore v British Coal Corp [1990] 2 QB 338, [1990] 2 All ER 981, [1990] 2 WLR 1437, CA. Atwell v Michael Perry & Co [1998] 4 All ER 65. B v ......
-
Trevor Rush Mccafferty Wright V. Paton Farrell+robert Paton+peter Farrell
...possessed an inherent power to prevent misuse of its procedure. At this point, junior counsel referred to Acton v Graham Pearce & Co. [1997] 3 All E.R. 909, in order to contrast the position of a person who sued following upon the overturning of his conviction, as opposed to one who sought ......
Request a trial to view additional results