Adams v Batley; Cole v Francis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1886 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
...Johns 328 [ 70 ER 448]. 34 (1985) 156 CLR 397 at 403 per Gibbs CJ, 408 per Wilson and Dawson JJ. 35Adams v Batley; Cole v Francis (1887) 18 QBD 625. 36Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd (2003) 77 ALJR 1629; 201 ALR 37 (2003) 203 ALR 671 at 734 [353]. 38V......
-
McK v M
...ACT 1870 S1 COMMON INFORMERS ACT 1951 (UK) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ACT 1957 S11(7)(B) SAUNDERS V WEIL 1892 2 QB 321 ADAMS V BATLEY 18 QBD 625 Synopsis: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Preliminary issues Proceeds of crime - Whether power to order service out of jurisdiction - Whether Proceeds of Crime......
-
Zurich Indemnity Co. v. Matthews, (2005) 198 O.A.C. 304 (CA)
...compensation. But as was pointed out by LORD ESHER, M.R., when commenting in Saunders v. Wiel , [1892] 2 Q.B. 321, upon Adams v. Batley , 18 Q.B.D. 625, the punishment was there an object. And, whether you call it penalty, damages, or sum of money, it was not assessed with a view to compens......
-
West End Construction Ltd. and Scott v. Ontario (Minister of Labour), Human Rights Commission (Ont.), Tabar, Lee and Lee, (1986) 18 O.A.C. 51 (DC)
...but where, as was pointed out by Lord Esher, M.R., when commenting in Saunders v. Wiel, [[1892] 2 Q.B. 321] upon Adams v. Batley, [18 Q.B.D. 625], punishment was the object; and where the money to be paid, whether it was called penalty, or damage or sum of money, was not assessed with the v......
Request a trial to view additional results