Ahmed (Historical Injustice explained)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | [2023] UKUT 165 (IAC) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Ahmed (Historical Injustice Explained)
...(Historical Injustice Explained) [2023] UKUT 165 (IAC) Dove J (President) and Sheridan UTJ UPPER TRIBUNAL (IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER) Human rights — Article 8 of the ECHR — private and family life — proportionality — historical injustice explained — Patel (historic injustice; NIAA Part......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2023-10-23, UI-2023-003322
...that the Appellant had suffered historical injustice in any event. He referred to the case of Ahmed (historical injustice explained) [2023] UKUT 00165 (IAC). This case was promulgated on 3 July 2023 after the Judge’s decision, but further clarifies Patel (historic injustice; NIAA Part 5A) I......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2023-11-06, UI-2023-002366
...both Mr Hoare and Ms Arif to the decision of a Presidential panel of the Upper Tribunal in Ahmed (historical injustice explained) [2023] UKUT 00165 (IAC), neither sought to make any submissions on that decision. The Presidential panel of the Upper Tribunal “1. As is clear from the decision ......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2024-01-17, UI-2023-002679
...passages in the cases of Patel (historic injustice; NIAA Part 5A) [2020] UKUT 00351 (IAC) and Ahmed (historical injustice explained) [2023] UKUT 00165 (IAC). In particular I (i) The distinction drawn in Patel between cases of ‘historic injustice’ and ‘historical injustice’, and the example ......