Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date18 May 2011
Date18 May 2011
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Justice Mummery, Lord Justice Rix and Lord Justice Patten

Aitken
and
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
Real evidence required

Users of the tribunal system in discrimination cases and their professional advisers were reminded that they needed evidence to prove facts, facts on which to base legal submissions, and real, not imaginary questions of law for appeal.

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Mummery, Lord Justice Rix and Lord Justice Patten) so stated, inter alia, on May 18, 2011, when dismissing an appeal by Brian Aitken, a former policeman, from the dismissal by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (Mrs Justice Slade, Mr B. Fitzgerald and Ms G. Mills)UNK ([2011] 1 CMLR 58) of his appeal from the dismissal by an employment tribunal of his claims of, inter alia, direct disability, disability-related discrimination and harassment against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis.

LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY stated that the Court of Appeal should not be drawn into unnecessary speculation about what the law...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Robert Owen v Amec Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 May 2019
    ...it is well established that the question of what would be a reasonable adjustment is a matter of fact and degree: see Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWCA Civ 582; [2012] ICR 78, at para. 65 (Mummery LJ). That question is not one of 82 The relevant PCP for this pu......
  • Mr Alastair Logan v BAE Systems Surface Ships Ltd: 4105086/2016
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 12 January 2018
    ...5 perception of such a protected characteristic. 232. The Tribunal was referred to Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] ICR 78 in which the Court of Appeal held that the ET was justified in finding that the reason for the respondent’s treatment the claimant was not his d......
  • Mr J White v Transport for London and others: 2300219/2019 and others
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 14 April 2023
    ...in the detrimental treatment, such as a decision to dismiss. 262. This was confirmed in Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis 2012 ICR 78, CA, when the Court of Appeal when, on the facts of that case, the employer had not acted on the basis of stereotypical assumptions about men......
  • Ms L Meachin v Henley-on-Thames Town Council: 3322384/2021
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 27 December 2023
    ...without the need to concern itself with constructing a hypothetical comparator. 98. In Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] ICR 78, the Court of Appeal held at para 41: On the comparator issue, the appeal tribunal repeated its conclusion that the employment tribunal had ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT