Akar v Attorney General of Sierra Leone
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1969 |
| Year | 1969 |
| Date | 1969 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
17 cases
-
Hilroy Humphreys Claimant v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda Defendant. [ECSC]
...rules relating to the interpretation of the Constitution. [137] The letter and spirit doctrine is derived from the case of AKAR v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SIERRA LEONE (1969) 3 WLR 970. The case essentially concerned an attempt by the appellant to maintain his citizenship of Sierra Leone, being ......
- Attorney-General v Mohamed Alli and Others
- An Application by Norris Williams and Cecil Salisbury; an Application under Articles 2, 10, 19, 47 and 73 of the Constitution of Guyana
-
Payne v Attorney General
...or other official instruments, acts or transactions which contravene those provisions Akar v. Attorney-General of Sierra Leone [1970] A.C. 853: [1969] 3 All E.R. 384 P.C. That order goes on to state:– 369 “And accordingly where the words “St. Christopher, Nevis and Anguilla” occur in any su......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The rule of law and good governance: a constitutional 'conclusive evidence' clause and Re Aubrey Norton
...the appointment of members of the Judiciary. They had not been so appointed. 71 See supra n. 64, at p. 280-281. 72 See supra n. 64. 73 [1970] A.C. 853. this case required, first, that the amendment should have been passed by two successive sessions of the House of Representatives between wh......