Akingbehin v Akingbehin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1964
Date1964
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Jayakumari a/p Arul Pragasam v Suriya Narayanan a/l v Ramanathan
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 d1 Janeiro d1 1996
  • Hall v Hall
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 d2 Janeiro d2 1971
    ...is shown by a case which camebefore this Court in 1964. It is only reported in The Law Journal, 108 Solicitors Journal, at page 520: Aklnxbehin v. Akingbehin. There was a difference of opinion in the Court. The majority of the Court thought that unpleasantness and inconvenience was not a su......
  • Bassett v Bassett
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 d4 Novembro d4 1974
    ...house. It is difficult to draw the line, as is shown by a case which came before this Court in 1964: Akingbehin v. Akingbehin (1964) 108 Solicitors' Journal 520. There was a difference of opinion in the court. The majority of the court thought that unpleasantness and inconvenience was not a......
  • Ebanks (C) v Ebanks (G)
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 8 d1 Junho d1 2009
    ...M.R. applied). Mere unpleasantness and inconvenience is not a sufficient ground for making such an order (Akingbehin v. Akingbehin (1964), 108 Sol. Jo. 520, followed). ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT