Albemarle Supply Company Ltd v Hind and Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1928
Date1928
Year1928
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Sethia Financial Services Ltd v Nicholas Chu Fai Hung & Mak Siau King (as claimant)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1986
  • Gericke Pte Ltd v Nortrans Shipping Pool Pte Ltd (Dah Chong Industries Pte Ltd, Third Party)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 July 1997
    ...of the tilting platform and the counterclaim was dismissed: at [11], [12] and [16]. Albemarle Supply Company, Limited v Hind and Company [1928] 1 KB 307 (folld) Boral Gas, The [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 342 (folld) Lyle Shipping Company, Limited v Corporation of Cardiff; Churchill and Sim (Third ......
  • Lombard North Central Plc v European Skyjets Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 30 March 2022
    ...was entitled to make a call, but not in the amount sought. 137 What happens in these circumstances? In Albermarle Supply Company Limited v Hind and Company [1928] 1 KB 307, 318, Scrutton LJ addressed the position where a lien had been asserted over goods for too great a sum, and analysed th......
  • Tappenden v Artus
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 11 July 1963
    ...has been held in the cases to which our attention has been called more especially Green v. All Motors Limited and The Albemarle Supply Company Limited v. Hind & Company, that is the case of a motor car where it is necessary that the motor car should he kept in running condition and repa......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Legalflyer
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 April 2011
    ...to be created over the aircraft or part. An example of this situation arose in the case of Albemarle Supply Company v Hind and Company [1928] 1 KB 307. Here, despite the express agreement providing that the lessee could not create liens without the owner's consent, it was held that the owne......