Alcock v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1892 |
| Date | 1892 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
McK v RM
...person entitled to the funds was resident out of the jurisdiction. Re Paramount Airways Ltd. [1993] Ch. 223 approved. Alcock v. Smith [1892] 1 Ch. 238; Cammell v. Sewell (1858) 3 H & N 617; Clare & Co. v. Dresdner Bank [1915] 2 K.B. 576 considered. 5. That s. 11(7)(b) of the Statute of Limi......
-
Macmillan Inc. v Bishopsgate Investment Trust Plc (No. 3)
...of his own country. 95Thirdly, there are negotiable instruments. These are assimilated to chattels, so that the lex situs applies; see Alcock v. Smith (1892) 1 Ch.238 (although arguably this supports the law of the place of the transaction), Embericos (sic) v. Anglo-Austrian Bank (1904) 2......
-
Inglis v Robertson
...17 D. 1053, per Lord Deas at p. 1062; In re Artola Hermanos, 1890, 24 Q. B. D. 640, per Fry, L. J., at pp. 648, 650. 4Alcock v. SmithELR[1892], 1 Ch. 238, Kay, L. J., at pp. 267268; Savigny's Droit Romain, Brussels (vol. viii. 182); Savigny's Private International Law (Guthrie's translation......
-
McK v M
...V SECRETARY OF STATE 1985 1 AER 979 ANTONELLLI V SECRETARY OF STATE 1998 1 AER 997 CAMMELL V SEWELL 1858 3 H & N 617 ALCOCK V SMITH 1892 1 CH 238 CLARE & COMPANY V DRESDNER BANK 1915 2 KB 576 PARAMOUNT AIRWAYS LTD 1992 3 AER 1 UNITED KINGDOM INSOLVENCY ACT 1986 S238 (UK) EX PARTE BLAIN RE S......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract administration
...(1916) 1(2) Arbitration 3. 93 Compare Briscoe & Co Ltd v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1907] VLR 523. 94 Jackson v Barry Railway Co [1892] 1 Ch 238 at 247, per Bowen LJ; Ives & Barker v Willans [1894] 2 Ch 478 at 485–486, per Lindley LJ, at 491–492, per Lopes LJ. In Dixon v South Austra......
-
CONSIDERATION FOR A BILL OF EXCHANGE — AN OLD ISSUE RECONSIDERED
...in Jones v. Gordon(1877) 2 App. Cas. 616; Adib el Hinnawi v. Yacoub Fahmi[1936] 1 All E.R. 638. 14. As construed in Alcock v. Smith[1892] 1 Ch. 238, 256; see also Embiricos v. Anglo-Austrian Bank[1905] 1 K.B. 677; Chitty on Contracts, 26th ed., §2868. * Professor of Law, National University......