Alexander v Jenkins

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1892
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Goh Chok Tong; JB Jeyaretnam
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • Jeyaretnam v Goh Chok Tong
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 August 1986
    ...seen and heard the witnesses could not be sufficient to explain or justify the trial judge's conclusions: at [36]. Alexander v Jenkins [1892] 1 QB 797 (folld) Chow Yee Wah v Choo Ah Pat [1978] 2 MLJ 41 (refd) Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135 (folld) Khoo Sit Hoh v Lim Thean Tong [1912] AC 323;......
  • Random House Australia Pty Ltd v Abbott
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Mr Brian Yosef MACCABA v Dayan Yisroel Yaakov LICHTENSTEIN [QBD, 02/07/2004]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 2 July 2004
    ...question raises a number of points which to many will seem arcane and indeed appeared so to Lord Herschell as long ago as 1892: see Alexander v. Jenkins [1892] 1 QB 797 at 801. 12 Following the production of documents during the course of the case, it is now common ground that the Claimant ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT