Alexander v Jenkins
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1892 |
| Date | 1892 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
- Goh Chok Tong; JB Jeyaretnam
-
Jeyaretnam v Goh Chok Tong
...seen and heard the witnesses could not be sufficient to explain or justify the trial judge's conclusions: at [36]. Alexander v Jenkins [1892] 1 QB 797 (folld) Chow Yee Wah v Choo Ah Pat [1978] 2 MLJ 41 (refd) Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135 (folld) Khoo Sit Hoh v Lim Thean Tong [1912] AC 323;......
-
Jones v Jones
... ... F24 ] ... In Miller v. David F25 it is manifest that the words were not defamatory and were not spoken of the man in his trade. In Alexander v. Jenkins F26 Lord Herschell, in dealing with an imputation of the want of some general requisite, proceeded on the distinction between an office ... ...
-
McMullan v Mulhall and Farrell
...(2) 18 Q. B. D. 771. (3) [1892] 2 Q. B. 524. (1) [1916] 2 A. C. 481. (2) [1916] 2 A. C. 481, at p. 510. (3) [1916] 1 K. B. 351. (4) [1892] 1 Q. B. 797, at p. (1) [1916] 2 A.C. 481, at p. 507. (2) L. R. 9 C. P. 118. (3) 2 W. Bl. 753. (4) 1 C. & J. 301, at p. 305. (5) L. R. 9 C. P. 118, at p.......
Get Started for Free
