Alison L Young, PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT Oxford: Hart Publishing (www.hartpub.co.uk), 2009. xvi + 180 pp. ISBN 9781841138305. £45.

Pages154-157
DOI10.3366/E1364980909001097
Date01 January 2010
AuthorAdam Tomkins
Published date01 January 2010

Alison Young's short but densely argued book on the sovereignty of Parliament and the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) contains analysis of two main issues. The first is whether strong judicial protection of human rights in the United Kingdom can be squared with its ongoing commitment to “continuing” parliamentary sovereignty (that is to say, to the notion of the sovereignty of Parliament that posits that each Parliament of the United Kingdom may make or unmake any law and that no such Parliament may bind its successors). On this issue Young argues that it can. Her argument here is not normative but conceptual and doctrinal. She is interested not in whether the sovereignty of Parliament ought to survive, but in whether a particular variant of sovereignty is analytically compatible with strong legal rights protection. Young's second issue is whether the HRA is successful in allowing for both rights and democracy to be protected and respected in the United Kingdom constitution. Using the idea of “democratic dialogue” developed in Canada, she argues that it is. In both respects, therefore, the impression given by the book is that, while the significance and novelty of the HRA are not to be underplayed, there is a greater degree of constitutional continuity and a lesser degree of change at stake in the measure than one might first have thought.

Although the book is not formally divided into two parts, each of the main issues on which the book focuses is taken in turn, with chapters 1-3 being principally concerned with questions of continuing parliamentary sovereignty and chapters 4-6 being principally concerned with matters of rights, democracy and democratic dialogue. Young's style in each of the two parts is rather different. The opening chapters bring the reader directly in at the deep end – there is no gentle introduction here – tackling immediately some of the thornier and more technical problems associated with advanced scholarship on the sovereignty of Parliament, such as “manner and form”, the problem of “Henry VIII” clauses, implied repeal, and the alleged category of “constitutional statutes”. As such, these chapters will be most readily accessible only to readers already familiar with the law and with the secondary literature on the sovereignty of Parliament. While the argument is for the most part expert, there are some curious omissions. Particularly striking in this regard is the discussion of constitutional statutes, which features the first...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT