Allcroft v Lord Bishop of London ; Lighton v Lord Bishop of London
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1891 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1891 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Chichester Diocesan Fund & Board of Finance (Incorporated) v Simpson
... ... Lord Chancellor ... Lord Macmillan ... a fund for the provision of music in a London park: the fund for the oysters I should not be ... The leading case, Morice v. Bishop of Durham , 10 Ves. 522 , is relied on as ... ...
- National Anti-Vivisection Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Boucaut Bay Company Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Commonwealth
-
Visagie v State President and Others
...I think, in the following passage in the judgment of Lord Bramwell in Allcroft v Lord Bishop of London; Lighton v Lord Bishop of London [1891] AC 666 (HL) at 678 at 'Then it was said that there was something he had considered which he ought not to have considered, and something he had not c......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The principle of open justice and the judicial duty to give public reasons.
...is at stake': R v REM [2008] 3 SCR 3, 10 (McLachlin CJ for McLachlin CJ, Binnie, LeBel, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ). (68) [1891] AC 666, 678 (emphasis added). See also Re Merceron (1877) 7 Ch D 184, 187, where Jessel MR The first observation I will make upon that case is that th......
-
SHAPING A COMMON LAW DUTY TO GIVE REASONS IN SINGAPORE
...[2013] 4 SLR 483 at [10]. 53 Manjit Singh s/o Kirpal Singh v Attorney-General [2013] 4 SLR 483 at [11]. 54[1890] 24 QBD 213. 55[1891] AC 666. 56 Rose Antoine, “A New Look at Reasons — One Step Forward — Two Steps Backward”(1992) 44 Admin L Rev 453 at 454. 57[1875] 1 QB 52. 58[1892] 1 QB 426......