Alterskye v Scott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1948
Date1948
Year1948
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
104 cases
  • Deutsch-Sdamerikanische Bank AG v Codelco
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 9 December 1995
    ...G.F. Ritchie for the first respondent; W. Helfrecht, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney General. Cases cited: (1) -Alterskye v. Scott, [1948] 1 ALL E.R. 469; (1948), 92 Sol. Jo. 220, distinguished. (2) -Bankers Trust Co. v. Shapira, [1980] 1 W.L.R. 1274; [1980] 3 All E.R. 353. (3) -Church of S......
  • Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 March 1977
    ...made a condition of granting an order." 43 Since that time such an undertaking has always been implied, -as Mr. Justice Jenkins 3aid in Alterskye v. Scott (1945) I All England Reports 469. A party who seeks discovery of documents gets it on condition that he will make use of them only for t......
  • R v Howell (Errol) (pet dis)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 February 1982
    ...of which she was also legal officer. 10 I take the expression "collateral or ulterior purpose" from the judgment of Jenkins J. in Alterskye v. Scott [1948] 1 All E.R. 469. I do not use it in a pejorative sense, but merely to indicate some purpose different from that which was the only reaso......
  • Shire Pharmaceutical Contracts Ltd and another (Claimant/Part 20 Defendants) v Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University (Defendant/Part 20 Claimant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 6 December 2011
    ...[2004] EWHC 589, at paragraph 33. In that paragraph, Laddie J, considered the implied obligation set out in the well-known case of Alterskye v Scott. He came to the view that, on the facts of the case before him, it was not provided for by the CPR and decided that the fact that it was not p......
  • Get Started for Free