An Information against Page
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1611 |
| Date | 01 January 1611 |
| Court | Exchequer |
English Reports Citation: 145 E.R. 264
IN THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER
An Information against Page
' an information against page. In an information against Page, and another upon the statute of 3 & 4 E. G, cap. 21, for buying of butter, and selling of the same by retail contrary to the form of the statute, upon not guiltie pleaded, the jury found one of them only guiltie both of buying and selling, and the other not guiltie: and it was moved, that no judgement may be given in this case, inasmuch as the action is conceived upon a joynt buying by two : and it appeareth that this is but by one, but it was argued that judgement ought to be given, for it cannot be intended in law, as to this purpose a joynt buying, LAME, 20. YOHK ANJJ ALLEIN 265...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
21 cases
-
R. v. Barros (R.), [2011] N.R. TBEd. OC.027
...public n'en avait besoin que d'une seule » et « [qu'il n'avait] besoin que de Kassam » relativement à la question des « menaces » (d.a., à la p. 19). La juge du procès a ensuite conclu que le témoignage de M. Kassam n'était aucunement digne de foi (d.a., à la p. 19). Elle a affirmé ce qui s......
-
Cullen v O'Meara and Another
...the trial it appeared that the Plaintiffs had obtained a lease, dated the 7th May, 1862, from the trustees of the Blessington estate, of 34A. la. 19P., for a term of 1000 years, at a rent of £343 13s. 9d., for the purpose of building a Catholic University. The lease contained a covenant on ......
-
Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah
...as the matrimonial home.` The same kind of evidence by the appellant in respect of 42 Mount Sinai Avenue, 56 Mount Sinai Road, 2 Grove Lane, 19 Jalan Mariam and 36 Belmont Road was also rejected by the learned trial judge (498 and 500E of the Record of Appeal) as something which never did t......
-
Telecommunications Services of Trinidad and Tobago Ltd v Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago
...exhibit “ LA 15” page 789 17 TSTT's Principal Affidavit at exhibit “ LA 17” page 803 18 TSTT's Principal Affidavit at exhibits “ LA 18” and “ LA 19” page 809 - 19 TSTT's Principal Affidavit at exhibits “ LA 20” page 821 20 Unreported 24 August 2000; [2000] Lexis Citation 5611 21 TSTT's Prin......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Trends in Exclusive Forum Bylaws: They're Valid, Now What?
...at Law No. 3, Dallas Cnty. Tex., Feb. 15, 2013). 51 Amended Petition for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Genoud v. Edgen Grp., Inc., No. 625244 (La. 19th Jud. Dist. Ct. filed Oct. 22, 2013) 52 Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Edgen Grp., Inc. v. Genoud, No. 9055-VCL (Del. Ch. filed Oct. ......
-
Trends In Exclusive Forum Bylaws
...d41284exv3w1.htm). 54 Amended Petition for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Genoud v. Edgen Grp., Inc., No. 625244 (La. 19th Jud. Dist. Ct. filed October 22, 55 Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Edgen Grp., Inc. v. Genoud, No. 9055-VCL (Del. Ch. filed October 31, 2013). 56 Telephonic Heari......
-
State Tax Return - Nexus Update: 2003/2004 cont'd
...consumers. 6. LOUISIANA a. State of Louisiana and Secretary of Dep't of Revenue and Taxation v. Dell Catalog Sales, L.P., Docket No. 456,807 (La. 19th Jud. Dist. Ct., May 25, i. Dell Catalog Sales L.P. ("DCSLP"), a Texas limited partnership, was a vendor of computers that conducted a nation......
68 books & journal articles
-
The Problem with Preferable Procedure
...C.p.c., art. 999(d). Malhab c. Métromédia CMR Montréal Inc., [2003] R.J.Q. 1011, 1020 (C.A.); Carrier c. Rochon, J.E. 2000-1807 (C.A.), à la p. 19; Pearl c. Investissements Contempra Ltée (Remorquage Québécois à Vos Frais Enr.), [1995] R.J.Q. 2697, 2704 (C.S.). C.p.c., art. 34 in limine, 95......
-
Les Recours Collectifs et le Droit International Privé Au Québec
...C.p.c., art. 999(d). Malhab c. Métromédia CMR Montréal Inc., [2003] R.J.Q. 1011, 1020 (C.A.); Carrier c. Rochon, J.E. 2000-1807 (C.A.), à la p. 19; Pearl c. Investissements Contempra Ltée (Remorquage Québécois à Vos Frais Enr.), [1995] R.J.Q. 2697, 2704 (C.S.). C.p.c., art. 34 in limine, 95......
-
In a Class All its Own: The Advent of the Modern Class Action and its Changing Legal and Social Mission
...C.p.c., art. 999(d). Malhab c. Métromédia CMR Montréal Inc., [2003] R.J.Q. 1011, 1020 (C.A.); Carrier c. Rochon, J.E. 2000-1807 (C.A.), à la p. 19; Pearl c. Investissements Contempra Ltée (Remorquage Québécois à Vos Frais Enr.), [1995] R.J.Q. 2697, 2704 (C.S.). C.p.c., art. 34 in limine, 95......
-
Typicality, Preferable Procedure, and Superiority: Ontario Class Proceedings Act, 1992 and Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
...C.p.c., art. 999(d). Malhab c. Métromédia CMR Montréal Inc., [2003] R.J.Q. 1011, 1020 (C.A.); Carrier c. Rochon, J.E. 2000-1807 (C.A.), à la p. 19; Pearl c. Investissements Contempra Ltée (Remorquage Québécois à Vos Frais Enr.), [1995] R.J.Q. 2697, 2704 (C.S.). C.p.c., art. 34 in limine, 95......
Get Started for Free
3 provisions
-
The Welfare Reform Act 2012 (Commencement No. 17, 19, 22, 23 and 24 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions (Modification) (No. 2)) Order 2018
...No. 19 Order66 FY5 FY6 FY7 5th December 2018 Articles 3(2)(m) and 4(2)(m) of the No. 19 Order FY1 FY4 LA12 LA15 LA18 LA21 FY2 FY8 LA13 LA16 LA19 PR4 1 to PR4 3 FY3 LA11 7 LA14 LA17 LA20 5th December 2018 Articles 3(2)(c) and 4(2)(e) and (f) of the No. 22 Order HA0 2 to HA0 4 HA9 NW10 0 and ......
-
The Welfare Reform Act 2012 (Commencement No. 19 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions and Commencement No. 9 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions (Amendment)) Order 2014
...LA1. LA2 0. LA2 6. LA2 9. LA3. LA4. LA5 0. LA5 8 and LA5 9. LA6 1 and LA6 2. LA7. LA8. LA9. LA11. LA12. LA13. LA14. LA15. LA16. LA17. LA18. LA19. LA20. LA21. LA22. LA23. M44. PR3. PR4 1 to PR4 3. PART 14 THE NO. 27 RELEVANT DISTRICTS BB7. CA1. CA2. CA3. CA4. CA5. CA6. CA7. CA8 0 and CA8 1. ......
-
The Identity Cards Act 2006 (Commencement No. 6) Order 2009
...L67, L68, L69, L70, L71, L72, L74, L75; LA1, LA2, LA3, LA4, LA5, LA6, LA7, LA8, LA9, LA10, LA11, LA12, LA13, LA14, LA15, LA16, LA17, LA18, LA19, LA20, LA21, LA22, LA23; LL12, LL13; OL13, OL14, OL95; PR0, PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4, PR5, PR6, PR7, PR8, PR9, PR11, PR25, PR26; SK9, SK10, SK11, SK12, S......