Andersen v Marten

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date08 July 1908
Date08 July 1908
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Masefield AG v Amlin Corporate Member Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • January 26, 2011
    ...there was no need for Lord Blackburn to state whether he was referring to an ATL or a CTL. 42 I interject at this stage a reference to Andersen v. Marten [1908] AC 334, to which reference was not made by either party at the hearing, although the authority was included in our bundles, and Lo......
  • Horlock v Beal
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • January 21, 1916
    ...Strack, 10 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 70; 93 L. T. Rep. 169; (1905)K. B. 315; Andersen v. Marten, 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 85; 99 L. T. Rep. 254,: (1908) A. C. 334 ; Goss T. Withers, 2 Burl. 683, 694 ; Polurrian Steamship Company v. Young, 13 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 39; 112 L. T. Rep. 1053; (1915) 1 K.B.92......
  • Kastor Navigation Company Ltd v AGF MAT (Kastor to)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 10, 2004
    ...stranding or the capture. That was the ground relied on expressly by Burrough J, and it is also the explanation of the case given in Andersen v. Marten [1908] 1 KB 601 at 608 (CA). Subject to the formalities connected with constructive as opposed to actual total losses, since Kastor Too was......
  • Kastor Navigation Company Ltd v AGF MAT (Kastor to)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • December 4, 2002
    ...after his cause of action has accrued? In PYSBE v. Beer [1946] 79 LLR 417 Atkinson J. regarded the decision of the House of Lords in Andersen v. Marten [1908] AC 334 as authority for the proposition that "once you have got a CTL, the mere fact that it may ultimately become an actual loss be......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Masefield AG v. Amlin Corporate Member Ltd.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 2, August 2011
    • August 1, 2011
    ...and Scottish Marine Insurance Co Lid (1869) LR 4 QB 676, affd (1870) LR 5 QB 599; Cory v Burr (1883) 8 App Cas 393; Andersen v Marten [1908] AC 334. (63) Polurrian Steamship Co Ltd v Young [1915] 1 KB 922; Marstrand Fishing Co Ltd v Beer [1937] 1 All ER 158; Dawson's Field (Unreported, Arbi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT