Anderson and Another v Thomas

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date18 April 1833
Date18 April 1833
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 131 E.R. 768

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Anderson and Another
and
Thomas

anderson and another v. thomas. April 18, 1833. The mis-statement of the form of action at the commencement of a declaration is an irregularity only, and not fatal on special demurrer. The Plaintiff commenced a declaration in assumpsit on a bill of exchange, with the usual money counts, by alleging that the Defendant was summoned to answer them " of a plea of trespass on the case;" and stated that the Defendant had accepted a bill, payable to Plaintiff or order, of 5001., valued in freight, four months after the arrival thereof. Breach, that the Plaintiff had disregarded his promises, and had not paid any of the said monies. Upon special demurrer, Wilde Serjt. objected that the declaration did not commence with stating correctly the form of action, pursuant to the rule of Court, M. 1654, s. 16, and that the breach [679] was too general, inasmuch as a question might arise as to what was or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Holford against Bailey
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 1 d4 Janeiro d4 1846
    ...the rule of Hil. 4 W. 4, Forms, No. 1; Ball v. Hamlet (1 C. M. & R. 575. S. C. 5 Tyrwh. 201). Before the new rules, in Anderson v. Thomas (9 Bing. 678), it was held that not to state fully the form [1002] of action was, only an irregularity : and the words " of a plea that he render to him ......
  • Acland, Bart., v Buller and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 31 d1 Janeiro d1 1848
    ...objection does not hold good on demurrer, for the proper course would be to set aside the writ or the declaration : A-nderxan v. Thomas (9 Bing. 678). The distress was made under the warrant of the justices, and not under the certificate of the commissioners, which is given by the 76th sect......
  • Sullivan v Burke Penrose v Same
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 5 d4 Novembro d4 1846
    ...Bench. SULLIVAN and BURKE PENROSE and SAME. Anderson v. ThomasENR 9 Bing. 678. Rex v. CassonUNK 3 D. & Ry. 36. 204 CASES AT LAW. M. T. 1846. acres referred to in the conviction must of necessity mean English Queen'sBench. acres, as at present defined by the statute 6 G. 4, c. 74, and that R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT