Anderson v HM Advocate

JurisdictionScotland
Date1974
CourtHigh Court of Justiciary
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 cases
  • Rr, Petitioner
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 7 Octubre 2020
    ...ECHR 2127; (2012) 54 EHRR 23; [2012] 2 Costs LO 139; 32 BHRC 1; [2012] Crim LR 375; The Times, 22 December 2011 Anderson v HM Advocate 1974 SLT 239 BBC, Petrs sub nom BBC, Petrs (No 3) 2002 JC 27; 2002 SLT 2; 2001 SCCR 440 Beck, Petr [2010] HCJAC 8; 2010 SLT 519; 2010 SCCR 222; 2010 SCL 568......
  • Petitions To The Nobile Officium By William Beck+nat Fraser+luke Mitchell+colin Murphy+alexander Gallagher+petitions Under The Human Rights Acts 1998 By Nat Fraser+alexander Gallagher
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 29 Enero 2010
    ... ... been appointed administratively to be heard by the enlarged bench;  the issue of competency arises also in each of these cases.  The Lord Advocate is not, so far, a party to these proceedings and has not been invited to address the court on the issue of competency or on any other issue.  She ... [24]      These authorities were referred to by the court in Anderson v HM Advocate 1974 SLT 229 when Lord Justice-General Emslie said at page 240: “These classical descriptions of the power have been accepted ... ...
  • Abdelbaset Al Megrahi V. Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 15 Octubre 2008
    ...of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 by the presiding judge or other trial judges. Cases referred to: Anderson v HM Advocate 1974 SLT 239 Borgers v BelgiumHRC Series A No 214 (1991); 15 EHRR 92 Bulut v Austria RJD 1996-II 346 (1996); 24 EHRR 84 Connolly, Petitioner 1997 SLT 689 Del......
  • Alistair Campbell V. Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 26 Febrero 2008
    ... ... Much of the incidental procedure before the hearing of the appeal was taken up with an allegation that the appellant had been defectively represented at the extradition hearing, under reference to Anderson v HM Advocate 1996 JC 29. In the written submissions which the appellant's representatives were ordered to lodge it was alleged that because of this defective representation there had been a "miscarriage of justice" before the sheriff: an expression derived from section 106(3) of the Criminal ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT