Andrew J M Steven, PLEDGE AND LIEN Edinburgh: Edinburgh Legal Educational Trust, Studies in Scots Law vol 2, 2008. xxx + 303 pp. ISBN 9780955633218. £30.

DOI10.3366/E1364980909001620
Date01 May 2009
Pages355-356
AuthorD L Carey Miller
Published date01 May 2009

Dr Andrew Steven's Pledge and Lien is the second volume in the Studies in Scots Law series which commenced with Dr Ross Anderson's monograph on assignation, also published in 2008 (and reviewed at 154 above). Andrew Steven refers to his work as an “updated and restructured” version of his 1997 doctoral thesis. In this regard it may be noted at the outset that the book has all the features and qualities of an effective legal text while retaining the penetrative character of a thesis on the many difficult issues which the subject throws up. After commenting on the book's scope and coverage the review will seek to substantiate this positive evaluation.

Pledge is dealt with in the initial eight chapters with lien covered in the subsequent ten. In respect of each topic there are initial introductory and historical chapters. The continuity factor in the development of both subjects makes historical perspective indispensable to proper understanding. The difference between the unitary device of pledge and the wider concept of lien is reflected in different treatments with, roughly, one third of the text on pledge and two thirds on lien.

Despite – or, indeed, perhaps because of – the extended continuity of development from Civilian roots, pledge is a security device which raises many issues. In what is the most comprehensive modern treatment available, the author deals with points of difficulty with commendable economy and clarity. Treatment of the important practical question whether the creditor can retain the subject as security for subsequent debts is illustrative, reflecting the book's characteristically skilful treatment of matters not open to purely descriptive account. Bringing to bear the full range of authority, judicial and juridical, the author distinguishes pledge constituted for a specific advance and an open-ended pledge in which a state of continuing possession may be taken to imply “that any further advances are made because of that possession”. The conclusion here is arrived at in large measure on the basis of Bell. This emphasis shows another feature of Dr Steven's work: while the treatment is quite strongly comparative, domestic sources are given priority. The balance between primary sources, authoritative or persuasive, and comparative material, enhancing understanding and critical perspective, is carefully maintained. This makes the book a versatile tool with potential valuable utility to both practice and teaching (the reviewer's honours...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT