Andrew Page Drummond v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2003 SCCR 108 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Date | 2003 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Macklin v HM Advocate
... ... Respondent ... Andrew Brown QC ... Angela Gray (Instructed by Appeals Unit, Crown Office) ... Lord ... ...
-
Daniel Mcneil Mcgill Adam V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...breach of section 92 was a fundamental irregularity. It was irrelevant whether the appellant was prejudiced thereby (Drummond v HM Adv, 2003 SCCR 108). [20] The conversation between the clerk and Mrs N was also a part of the trial. It took place outwith the presence of the accused. For the ......
-
David Mackay Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...(Scotland) Act 1995 provides that “no part of a trial shall take place outwith the presence of the accused”. In Drummond v HM Advocate 2003 SCCR 108, Lord Marnoch, delivering the Opinion of the Court, traced the history of section 92 back to its origins in the Criminal Justice Act 1587. He ......
-
James Holland V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...this appeal, section 92(1) of the 1995 Act requires that no part of a trial shall take place outwith his presence (cf Drummond v HM Adv, 2003 SCCR 108). [43]If the submission for the appellant were sound, it would not be a sufficient safeguard if the Crown was prevented from asking the witn......
Request a trial to view additional results