Annamunthodo v Oilfields Workers' Trade Union

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1961
Date1961
Year1961
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
63 cases
  • Calvin v Carr
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 1278 , P.C. applied ... Australian Workers' Union v. Bowen (No. 2) ( 1948 ) 77 C.L.R. 601 ; ... 193 approved ... Annamunthodo v. Oilfields Workers' Trade Union [ 1961 ] A.C. 945 , ... ...
  • Vasudevan Pillai v City Council of Singapore
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 23 April 1965
    ...the appellants Gordon Slynn and J Grimberg (Linklaters & Paines) for the respondent. Annamunthodo Walter v Oilfields Workers' Trade Union [1961] AC 945 (refd) Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40 (folld) Municipal Ordinance (Cap 133, 1936Rev Ed)ss 17, 383 Administrative Law–Dismissal from employmen......
  • Brown (Purcell) v Church of God & Saints of Christ
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 28 May 2002
    ...These procedures were invalid as they were conducted in the absence of the appellant. The following passage from Annamunthodo v. Oilfields Workers' Trade Union [1961] 3 All E.R. 621 states the position in law with clarity. It reads at 625 where Lord Denning said: "When the general council ......
  • Visvasam v Singapore Toddy Tappers' Union
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 September 1968
    ...union undertake to abide by the terms of the oath of obligation as in White v Kuzych. In Annamunthado v Oilfield & Workers Trade Union [1961] 3 All ER 621 which is also a Privy Council case, the appellant was a member of the respondent union and as such had agreed to obey and was subject to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Disciplinary proceedings against the bar: what is the proper role of the court of appeal?
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 13-2, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...an answer, he can give it. 12. Wiseman v Burneman [1969] 3 All ER 275; Lloyd v McMahon [1987] 1 All ER 1118. 13. See Annamuntbodo v Owtu [1961] AC 945; Maharaj v AG (No. 1) [1977] ! All ER 411; DeMerieux v AG of Barbados (1982) 7 WILJ 178; Lazare v Wright (1911) 2 Trin LR 103; Bachoo (1962)......
  • Silent Partners? Trade Unions, Corporations and Penalty Privilege in the Federal Court of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-1, March 2022
    • 1 March 2022
    ...Industrial Relations, Politics and Law (The Law Book Company,1994) 74-96.71. WalterAnnamunthodo v Oilf‌ield Workers’Trade Union [1961] AC 945; Clark v Printing and Kindred Industries Union(1976) 9 ALR 621 (‘Clark’). Other rules even excluded outcomes arrived at through tribunal hearings in ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT