Annangel Glory Compania Naviera S.A. v M. Golodetz Ltd (Samos Glory)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Date1988
Year1988

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Itex Intagrani Export S.A. v Care Shipping Corporation (Cebu (No. 2))
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Western Bulk Shipowning III A/S v Carbofer Maritime Trading ApS [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 May 2012
    ...defeated the right. The equitable charge was one that required registration under the Companies Act. 43 In The "Annangel Glory" [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 45 Saville J, as he then was, had to consider whether the Ugland Trader was rightly decided. He decided that Tagart (in which, as appears from......
  • Richard Dale Agnew and Another v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 June 2001
    ... [1986] Ch 471; Itex Itagrani Export SA v Care Shipping Corp. [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep 316) or as a floating charge ( Annangel Glory Compania Naviera SA v M Golodetz Ltd. [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 45). In none of these cases was it held to be a fixed charge, but the better view is that it is not a......
  • Bexhill Uk Ltd v Abdul Razzaq
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 October 2012
    ...Official Receiver (1888) 13 App Cas 523 . See also Annangel Glory Compania Naviera SA v M Golodetz Ltd et al (The "Annangel Glory") [1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep 45 at 47–8, where this principle was applied to future 11 [1902] 2 KB 190 at 193. See also, eg. Court Line Ltd v Aktiebolaget Gotaverken (......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • UNRAVELLING THE IDENTITY OF THE CARRIER
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...the vessel to Latin American Shipping Corporation who in turn sub-sub-chartered the vessel to Itex Itagrani Export S.A. 6 [1988] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 45. Here, the owners of the vessel, Annangel Glory Compania Naviera S.A. time chartered the vessel to Middle East Marketing Corporation U.K.) Ltd. ......