Anonimous (1684) 1 Vern 301

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date16 October 1684
Date16 October 1684
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 23 E.R. 449

IN COURT, LORD KEEPER.

Anonimous

[253] de term. S. michaelis, 36 car. II. 1684, in curia cancellari^e. Case 245.-anonimous. 16 Octobris [1684]. In Court, Lord Keeper. [I] Eq. Ca. Ab. 233, pi. 5, S. C. If one of the parties after publication passed has an order to examine upon the usual affidavit, the other party may not only cross-examine, but examine at large. Upon a motion for leave to examine after publication, upon making the usual oath of not having seen the depositions; the Lord Keeper declared, that in such a case the other side should be at liberty to examine at large, as well as to cross-examine the witnesses produced by the party that made the motion (which was all he might do formerly); and his reason was, that a crafty solicitor may lie in the lurch, and examine nothing till after publication is past: and the other party may think himself secure, and so not examine to those points, which he could otherwise have proved, in regard he finds his adversary has not examined to those matters : and when once publication is past, and the party that examined has seen his own depositions ; then the side that lay still having tied up his adversary, so that he can only cross-exanfine the other's witnesses, applies for an order upon the usual affidavit to enlarge publication, and when he has got that order, then he comes in with a whole cloud of witnesses : and though it may be thought hard, that any one should have liberty to examine, after he has seen the depositions; yet his Lordship thought it a reasonable penalty on such, as would not examine in time ; or that should lie upon the catch to [254] take C. in.-15 450 SUTTON COLDFIELD (CORPORATION of) V. WILSON 1 VEEN. 254. advantage of the other party; and ordered the register to take notice of it as a fixed rule for the future.(l) (1) And where the defendant after publication examined a witness, and then conceiving himself irregular on the usual affidavit got an order to re-examine, and the witness died before re-examination, the defendant may make use of the first depositions, Copeland v. Stanton, 1 P. Wms. 414. So where bill by hubsand and wife, and witnesses examined and publication passes, on the death of the husband, and new bill for the same matter by second husband, same witnesses may be examined, Anon. post, 2 vol. 197. Secus where by the death of husband no abatement, and the wife's inheritance not in the case, Shelberry v. Briggs and Al', post, 2 vol. 249...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Whitmore v Turquand
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 6 March 1861
    ...considered in the judgments of the Vice- Chancellor and of his Lordship. ', The following authorities were referred to : - Dunch v. Kent (1 Vern. 260) ; Spottiswoode y. Stockdale (G. Coop. 102) ; Garrard v. Lord Lauderdale (3 Sim. 1 ; 2 Rusa. & Myl. 451) ; Walwyn v. Coutes (3 Mer. 707) ; Fi......
  • Ex parte Charles Morgan, Francis Bryant Adams, Francis Bryant Adams the Younger, and Charles Morgan the Younger
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 30 January 1863
    ...the essence of the contract, and creditors can come in and execute the deed after the expiration of the stipulated time ; Dwnch v. Kent (1 Vern. 260) ; Spottiswoode v. Stockdak (G. Coop. 102); Broadbent v. Thornton (4 De G. & Sm. 65); Nicholson v. Tutin (2 K. & J. 18); Rawort/t v. Parker (I......
  • Watson v Knight
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 13 June 1854
    ...not be excluded, though he does not come in within the time prescribed; and see Bmadbent v. Thornton (4 De G. & Sm. 65); Dunch v. Kent (1 Vern. 260); Spotfisiuoode v. StocMale (Sir G. Coop. 102); Hill on Trustees (p. 334). Mr. Bagshawe, jun., in the same interest. Mr. Selwyn, for the assign......
  • Evidence, Witnesses, and Proof
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1744
    ...to take Advantage of the other Party, and ordered the Register to take Notice of it as a fixt Rule for the Future. Mich. 1684, Anon. 1 Vern. 253. . 6. If Interrogatories are exhibited in the Examiner's Office, and Witnesses examined thereon, either Party may without Application to the Court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT