Appeal Under Section 164(1) Of The Children's Hearings (scotland) Act 2011 By Xy

JurisdictionScotland
JudgeLord Malcolm,Lord Drummond Young,Lord President
Neutral Citation[2019] CSIH 19
Date27 March 2019
Docket NumberXA92/18
CourtCourt of Session
Published date27 March 2019
FIRST DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION
[2019] CSIH 19
XA92/18
Lord President
Lord Drummond Young
Lord Malcolm
OPINION OF THE COURT
delivered by LORD MALCOLM
in an appeal under section 164(1) of the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011
by
XY
Appellant
against a decision of the sheriff on 22 June 2018
Appellant: Scott QC; Balfour & Manson LLP (for Gleeson McCafferty, Glenroth es)
Respondents: Moynihan QC, D Scullion (sol adv); Anderson Strath ern
Lord Advocate: Dunlop QC, Charteris; Scottish Governmen t Legal Department
Parents: Coutts; Drummond Miller LLP
Safeguarder for the sisters: Mrs Janet Mathieson, Solicitor; Anderson Maca rthur, Stornoway
27 March 2019
[1] XY is an adult brother of three younger sisters who are the subject of compulsory
supervision orders and are now in foster care. While he has contact with them, there have
been ongoing issues in respect of its nature and extent. Along with the children’s parents he
is strongly in favour of family reunification.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • ABC v Principal Reporter
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court (Scotland)
    • 18 d4 Junho d4 2020
    ...was not entitled to be deemed a relevant person. On 27 March 2019, the First Division refused the appeal and gave the following opinion ([2019] CSIH 19): “Opinion of the Court— [1] XY is an adult brother of three younger sisters who are the subject of compulsory supervision orders and are n......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT