Appuhamy v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1963 |
| Date | 1963 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- PP; Zainur bin Zakaria
-
R v Frater
...he referred to re Pollard [1868] L.R. 2 P.C. 106, Chang Hang Kiu v. Piggott [1909] A.C. 312Coward v. Stapleton [1953] 90 C.L.R. 573, Appuhamy v. R [1963] 1 All E.R. 762, Commissioner of Police v. Wood [1956] 1 W.A.L.R. 71, re Bachoo (1962) 5 W.I.R. 247, Maharaj v. Attorney for Trinidad [197......
-
Cotroni v. Quebec Police Commission and Brunet et al., (1977) 18 N.R. 541 (SCC)
...[paras. 8, 33]. Chang Hang Kiu v. Piggott, [1909] A.C. 312, refd to. [paras. 9, 34]; folld. [paras. 54, 61]. Appuhamy v. The Queen, [1963] A.C. 474, refd to. [paras. 10, 35]; folld. [paras. 54, McLeod v. St. Aubyn, [1899] A.C. 549, refd to. [paras. 11, 36]. R. v. Wolf, 2 N.R. 415; [1975] 2 ......
-
Re Mahesh J Roy
...of a summary process, the particulars need not be of the same level of detail as those in a count of indictment (see Appuhamy v The Queen [1963] AC 474 at p.488). However, it must satisfy the requirement that there must be sufficient particularity to enable the defendant to defend himself, ......
Request a trial to view additional results