Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Date1906
Year1906

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
41 cases
  • Mountbatten v Mountbatten
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Middleton v Middleton
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Arnold v Arnold
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Dunne v Saban
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • De Facto Cohabitation: the International Private Law Dimension
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...or its legal consequences, are recognised as binding;7272Cf the “recognition by” rule utilised in Armitage v Attorney-General [1906] P 135. (d) the exercise of party autonomy by the parties: have they purported to enter into an agreement to regulate their relationship and its financial or p......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...Al Sabki v Al Jajeh, 2019 ONSC 6394. Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier, [1895] AC 517; Kadri v Kadri, 2015 ONSC 321. Armitage v Attorney General, [1906] P 135. Travers v Holley, [1953] P 246 (Eng Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott, [1958] P 71. Indyka v Indyka, [1969] 1 AC 33 (HL); Mayfield v Mayfield......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...2020 ONSC 644, aff’d 2021 ONCA 748. Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier, [1895] AC 517; Kadri v Kadri, 2015 ONSC 321. Armitage v Attorney General, [1906] P 135. Travers v Holley, [1953] P 246 (Eng Chapter 7: Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars • where the cir......
  • Herbert Croly and American Progressive Thought
    • United States
    • Sage Political Research Quarterly No. 7-4, December 1954
    • 1 December 1954
    ...who swept each other over ideological difficulties in a tide 1 Henry Demarest Lloyd, Man the Social Creator (New York: Doubleday, 1906), p. 135.2 Herbert Croly, The Promise of American Life (New York: Macmillan, 1909).3 Eric Goldman, Rendezvous with Destiny (New York: Knopf, of emotion. The......
  • Get Started for Free