Armstrong v Armstrong
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1892 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon (Note)
...D. 531, and Cohen v. Rothfield (1919) 1 K.B. 410). That criterion was very rarely fulfilled: for examples where it was fulfilled see Armstrong v. Armstrong (1892) P. 98, Moore v. Moore (1896) 12 T.L.R. 221, and Christian v. Christian (1897) 67 L.J.P. 61Injunctions have however also been g......
-
Helicopter Resources Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia
...at [8] and [9] and for noncorporations see Sentry Corporation v Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (1990) 24 FCR 463 at 493, Armstrong v Armstrong [1892] P 98. 109 In that sense, the appellant submitted, the protection which the corporate accused had within the accusatorial criminal trial derived f......
-
Lyxor v Phoenix Meridian
...Style, Q.C. and C.D. McKie for the appellant; G. Halkerston and Ms. M. Hudson for the respondent. Cases cited: (1) Armstrong v. Armstrong, [1892] P. 98; (1892), 61 L.J.P. 63; 66 L.T. 384; 8 T.L.R. 339, referred to. (2) Nokia Corp. v. Interdigital Technology Corp., [2004] EWHC 2920 (Pat), re......
-
Sternson Ltd. v. CC Chemicals Ltd., (1981) 36 N.R. 507 (FCA)
...It is quite understandable, then, that the trial judge should have placed some reliance on Armstrong v. Armstrong and The Duke of Orleans, [1892] P. 98, a decision of the English Probate Division. In that case, the petitioner in a divorce proceeding had obtained a commission to examine witn......
Request a trial to view additional results