Armstrong v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Exchequer |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
The Koursk
...1888, 60 L. T. Rep. 250 22 Q. B. Div. 128, 131 Armstrong v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway CompanyENR 1875, 33 L. T. Rep. 228 L. Rep. 10 Ex. 47 Collision Vessel damaged by separate acts of two wrongdoing vessels Separate acts of neglect producing a single injury Judgement of Hill, J. (inf......
-
Seward v Owners of The Vera Cruz
...ship, and not extended to the master: Thorogood v. Bryan, 8 C. B. 115 ; Armstrong v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company, L. Rep. 10 Ex. 47; 33 L. Rep. N. S. The Milan, Lush. 388 ; The Khedive, 4 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 360; 43 L. T. Rep. N. S. 610; L. Rep. 5 App. Cas. 876. Even assuming th......
-
Wellwood v Alexander King Ltd
...2 I. R. 134. (4) 13 App. C. 1. (5) [1918] A. C., at p. 114. (6) [1918] A. C., at p. 370. (1) I.R. 10 C. L. 256. (1) 13 App. C. 1. (2) L. R. 10 Ex. 47. (3) 12 Q. B. D. (1) 12 P. D. 58; 13 A. C. 1. (2) [1907] 2 I. R. 437. (3) [1919] 2 I. R. 445. (1) [1902] Prob. 42, at p. 60. (2) [1920] 2 I. ......
-
The Bernina
...with it, yet in many cases it has been expressly aproved of : Armstrong v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company, L. Rep. 10 Ex. 47; 33 L. T. Rep. N. S. 228; 44 L. J. 89, Ex.; Waite v. North-EastemRailway Company, E. B. & E. 719; Spaight v. Tedcastle, 44 L. T. Sep. N. S. 588; 4 Asp. Mar.......
Request a trial to view additional results