Asfar & Company v Blundell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 08 November 1895 |
| Date | 08 November 1895 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier, Dr Meier & Dr Guntner Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbh
... ... 2 The Claimant ("AMT") is a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. It provides financial services in the United ... ...
-
Chan Sew Nang v Sindo Pasir Pte Ltd
...delivered in such a condition that they are substantially and in a mercantile sense different from those shipped: see Asfar v Blundell [1896] 1 QB 123.These cases limit the types of counterclaim or defences which may be available against claims for freight charges. From the affidavits filed......
- Somat Ali v Hand-in-Hand Mutual Fire and Life Insurance Company Ltd
-
Brown (B. S.) & Son Ltd v Craiks Ltd
...to what I say later with regard to price, it cannot be said that the cloth was not of merchantable quality. 39 In Asfar v. Blundell [1896] 1 Q.B. 123 dates damaged by sewage were sold and used for making vinegar. Such use could not be regarded as a normal use for dates. To be merchantable t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Carriage of Goods by Charterparty
...Ritchie v. Atkinson (1808), 10 East. 294, 103 E.R. 787. 94 Halcrow v. Lemesurier (1884), 10 Q.L.R. 239 (Q.B.). 95 As/arv. Blundell, [1896] 1 Q.B. 123 (C.A.). 96 Ibid.; see also Montedison v. Icroma (The Caspian Sea), [1980] 1 Lloyd's L.R. 91 (Q.B.). 376 MARITIME LAW or set-off, but he or sh......