Ashby v Tolhurst
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1937 |
| Year | 1937 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 cases
- Ee Kee Chai; People's Credit (Pte) Ltd
-
People's Credit (Pte) Ltd v Ee Kee Chai
...there was a bailment for reward and not a mere right or licence to park simpliciter or a purely gratuitous bailment. Ashby v Tolhurst [1937] 2 All ER 837 can be distinguished on its facts because, in that case, a mere licence to park was conferred at a fee and liability for damage was negat......
- Malayan Thread Company Sdn Bhd v Oyama Shipping Line Ltd and Another
- Syarikat Perniagaan United Aces Sdn Bhd v Majlis Perbandaran Petaling Jaya
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...142–44, 178 Appleton v Ritchie Taxi, [1942] OJ No 456 (CA) ........................................... 16, 43, 47, 63 Ashby v Tolhurst, [1937] 2 KB 242 ................. 5, 6, 7–9, 11, 12, 24, 55, 59–60, 63, 64, 290 Atlantic Furs Ltd v Mofatt Moving and Storage, [1985] NJ No 173 (Dist Ct) .......
-
Bailees for Reward: Specific Considerations When Assessing the Standard of Care
...thererom, liability should be ixed against the bailee, and the bailee should be denied the defence of novus actus interveniens . 134 [1937] 2 KB 242. 135 See Kieller v Sentinel Self-Storage Corp , 2008 ABQB 783 at paras 53–55. 136 Lifestyles Kitchens & Bath, a division of GVBS Inc v Danbury......