Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2001
Date2001
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • The Highland Council Against The School Closure Review Panel
    • United Kingdom
    • Sheriff Court
    • 17 February 2016
    ...to which there had been adequate exploration of whether there were viable alternatives. He referred to Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] Ch. 685. At para 34 the Vice Chancellor referred to the obligation of a court, contained in section 12(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998, to have “partic......
  • Simpkin v The Berkeley Group Holdings Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 22 June 2017
    ... ... See also Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers (No.2) [1990] 1 AC 109 , at 268–269, per Lord Griffiths; and Ashdown v. Telegraph Group Ltd [2002] Ch 149 , approving Hyde Park Residence Ltd v. Yelland [2001] Ch 143, 172 , per Mance LJ." ... ...
  • London Regional Transport v Mayor of London
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 August 2001
    ...regard to the importance of the Convention right to freedom of expression …" 33 He concluded (as he had previously done in Ashdown v Telegraph Group [2001] 2 WLR 967 at p.980) that the language of s.12(4) required the court to consider the importance of the Convention right "specifically an......
  • ISTIL Group Inc. v Zahoor
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 February 2003
    ... ... See also Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers (No.2) [1990] 1 AC 109 , at 268–269, per Lord Griffiths; and Ashdown v. Telegraph Group Ltd [2002] Ch 149 , approving Hyde Park Residence Ltd v. Yelland [2001] Ch 143 , 172, per Mance LJ ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • 'A real pea souper': the Panel Case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 2, August 2003
    • 1 August 2003
    ...Judicial Freedom of Movement--Interpreting Fair Dealing in Copyright Law' [2000] Intellectual Property Quarterly 164, 176-81. (65) [2001] Ch 685; aff'd [2002] Ch 149 ('Ashdown'). Sir Andrew Morritt V-C's decision at first instance was handed down before Conti J's judgment in The Panel Case,......
  • Crossing the Rubicon on the Human Rights Ferry
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 64-5, September 2001
    • 1 September 2001
    ...for Health, ex parte L [2001] 1 FLR 406; PvP (Removal of Child to New Zealand)[2001] 1 FCR 425, CA; and Ashdown vTelegraph Group Ltd [2001] 2 WLR 967. The effect of theSeptember 2001] Medical Treatment and Human RightsßThe Modern Law Review Limited 2001 the HRA 1998, Dame Butler-Sloss P has......
  • The Georgia State Litigation: Literal Copying in Education
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 82-3, May 2019
    • 1 May 2019
    ...(both last accessed 12 February 2019).57 For example, Ashdown vTelegraph Group Ltd [2001] Ch 685, 699 (Ch), affirmed [2002] Ch 149,174 (CA) (also observing that the use of quotations in the newspaper article added ‘flavour’ tothe article, and hence was of a commercial benefit to the defendant)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT