Askey v Golden Wine Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1948
Year1948
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 cases
  • Strongman (1945) Ltd v Sincock
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 12 July 1955
    ...see that if there was culpable negligence on the part of the person seeding damages, he might not be entitled to recover. In Askey v. Golden Wine Company Limited 1948, 2 All England Law Reports, page 35, some merchants had been guilty of culpable negligence in not taking proper steps to see......
  • Pitts v Hunt
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 April 1990
    ...against another who has participated in its commission." 14 This principle was applied by Denning J. (as he then was) in Askey v. Golden Wine Company & Ors. [1948] 2 AER 35. He held that the plaintiff who had been induced by the defendant's fraud to sell liquor in breach of the Food and Dru......
  • Safeway Stores Ltd and Others v Twigger and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 15 January 2010
    ...diligence had not been open to the offender and recovery of the fine was precluded by public policy, is the decision of Denning J in Askey v Golden Wine Ltd [1948] 2 All ER 35. In that case, the claimant purchased large quantities of alcohol from the defendants for the manufacture of cockt......
  • Safeway Stores Ltd and Others v Twigger and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 December 2010
    ...applies where the criminal act is one of strict liability and the claimant may not have been at fault at all. The closest case is Askey v Golden Wine Co Ltd [1948] 2 All ER 35 in which Mr Askey had been convicted of offences under the then applicable Food and Drugs legislation and was held......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Old and New Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 79-3, May 2016
    • 1 May 2016
    ...in the same conceptual family asthe retributive notion of an eye for an eye’.24 See Lord Denning’s opinion in Askey vGolden Wine Co Ltd [1948] 2 All ER 35 (KB), 38: ‘It is,I think, a principle of our law that the punishment inflicted by a criminal court is personal tothe offender, and that t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT