Assessor for Glasgow v Ron Wood Greetings Cards

JurisdictionScotland
Year2000
Date2000
CourtLands Valuation Appeal Court (Scotland)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Assessor Tayside Joint Valuation Board Against A Decision Of The Valuation Appeal Committee For Perth And Kinross
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 17 October 2017
    ...to be in a reasonable state of repair: Central Regional Assessor v United Glass 1981 SC 389; Glasgow Assessor v Ron Wood Greeting Cards [2000] RA 271; Armour on Valuation for 11 Rating (5th ed.), para 17-19. (By contrast, prior to the repeal of s 6(2) dwelling houses (and, prior to the comi......
  • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority v Assessor for Highland and Western Isles Valuation Joint Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House)
    • 22 December 2006
    ...LtdSC 1983 SC 18 Texstyle World v Assessor for Strathclyde RegionSC 1995 SC 588; 1996 SLT 782; [1995] RVR 171 Wood v Assessor for Glasgow [2000] RA 271 Textbooks etc. referred Armour, SB, Valuation for Rating (5th Clyde and Hope ed, W Green, Edinburgh, 1985), paras 5.53, 5.55, 14.13, 18.15 ......
  • Tayside Assessor v M
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House)
    • 17 October 2017
    ...Region (Assessor for) v United Glass Ltd 1981 SC 389; 1981 SLT (Notes) 114 Glasgow (Assessor for) v RonWood Greetings Cards Holdings [2000] RA 271; 1999 GWD 38–1868 Highland and Western Isles Valuation Joint Board (Assessor for) v Macleod 2001 SC 476; 2001 SLT 483; [2001] RVR 33 MacMurchie ......
  • United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority V. Assessor For Highland And Western Isles Valuation Joint Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 22 December 2006
    ...to pay any rent to take on the site. The site therefore had a nil value (eg BTC v Hingley, [1961] 2 QB 16; Ron Wood v Ass for Glasgow, [2000] RA 271). In any event, the Tribunal had erred in ignoring the effect of Direction No 2, which at the valuation date prohibited an essential part of t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT